Cargando…

Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players

The goal of this study was to investigate side-to-side differences and asymmetries regarding muscle characteristics in young tennis players. Thirty-four participants performed contractile property measurements (stiffness, tone, elasticity and time to relaxation) on the dominant and non-dominant extr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Colomar, Joshua, Corbi, Francisco, Baiget, Ernest
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196339
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0026
_version_ 1784787860781531136
author Colomar, Joshua
Corbi, Francisco
Baiget, Ernest
author_facet Colomar, Joshua
Corbi, Francisco
Baiget, Ernest
author_sort Colomar, Joshua
collection PubMed
description The goal of this study was to investigate side-to-side differences and asymmetries regarding muscle characteristics in young tennis players. Thirty-four participants performed contractile property measurements (stiffness, tone, elasticity and time to relaxation) on the dominant and non-dominant extremities including nine muscle groups involved in the kinetic chain of main tennis strokes. Significant differences (p≤0.05) and small-to-moderate effect sizes for greater stiffness and tone were found for the dominant biceps femoris (-11.1% and -5.6%; ES=0.53 and 0.54) and the non-dominant vastus medialis (5.4% and 3.2%; ES=-0.33 and -0.41), while greater tone was present in the non-dominant pectoralis major (4.0%; ES=-0.56). Time to relaxation was increased in the dominant biceps femoris (10.3%; ES=-0.58), the non-dominant pectoralis major (5.1%; ES=-0.56) and the gastrocnemius (9.1%; ES=-0.5). The non-dominant infraspinatus and dominant rectus abdominis showed greater elasticity than contralateral muscles (9.9% and -8.0%; ES=-0.58 and 0.6, respectively). These results reflect the existence of small-to-moderate differences when comparing side-to-side values of contractile characteristics in a small amount of the muscle groups tested. However, passive measurements of a relaxed muscle do not seem to fully reflect possible adaptation and changes derived from gameplay in young tennis players.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94657212022-10-03 Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players Colomar, Joshua Corbi, Francisco Baiget, Ernest J Hum Kinet Section I - Kinesiology The goal of this study was to investigate side-to-side differences and asymmetries regarding muscle characteristics in young tennis players. Thirty-four participants performed contractile property measurements (stiffness, tone, elasticity and time to relaxation) on the dominant and non-dominant extremities including nine muscle groups involved in the kinetic chain of main tennis strokes. Significant differences (p≤0.05) and small-to-moderate effect sizes for greater stiffness and tone were found for the dominant biceps femoris (-11.1% and -5.6%; ES=0.53 and 0.54) and the non-dominant vastus medialis (5.4% and 3.2%; ES=-0.33 and -0.41), while greater tone was present in the non-dominant pectoralis major (4.0%; ES=-0.56). Time to relaxation was increased in the dominant biceps femoris (10.3%; ES=-0.58), the non-dominant pectoralis major (5.1%; ES=-0.56) and the gastrocnemius (9.1%; ES=-0.5). The non-dominant infraspinatus and dominant rectus abdominis showed greater elasticity than contralateral muscles (9.9% and -8.0%; ES=-0.58 and 0.6, respectively). These results reflect the existence of small-to-moderate differences when comparing side-to-side values of contractile characteristics in a small amount of the muscle groups tested. However, passive measurements of a relaxed muscle do not seem to fully reflect possible adaptation and changes derived from gameplay in young tennis players. Sciendo 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9465721/ /pubmed/36196339 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0026 Text en © 2022 Joshua Colomar, Francisco Corbi, Ernest Baiget, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 3.0 License.
spellingShingle Section I - Kinesiology
Colomar, Joshua
Corbi, Francisco
Baiget, Ernest
Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title_full Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title_fullStr Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title_full_unstemmed Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title_short Inter-Limb Muscle Property Differences in Junior Tennis Players
title_sort inter-limb muscle property differences in junior tennis players
topic Section I - Kinesiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36196339
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0026
work_keys_str_mv AT colomarjoshua interlimbmusclepropertydifferencesinjuniortennisplayers
AT corbifrancisco interlimbmusclepropertydifferencesinjuniortennisplayers
AT baigeternest interlimbmusclepropertydifferencesinjuniortennisplayers