Cargando…
Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movem...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052 |
_version_ | 1784787871852396544 |
---|---|
author | Biały, Maciej Kublin, Kamil Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna Gnat, Rafał |
author_facet | Biały, Maciej Kublin, Kamil Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna Gnat, Rafał |
author_sort | Biały, Maciej |
collection | PubMed |
description | Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) tests can be used to detect functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A total of 83 young and physically active recreational athletes (mean age: 26.9 ± 9.7 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft were evaluated between the 3(rd) and the 4(th) month after surgery. Subjects received a similar, standardised rehabilitation programme. Two experienced raters, blinded to the objective of this study, were involved in functional outcome data collection using myofascial NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen tests. Only two of the NEURAC(®) tests showed significant differences in the results between the operated and the non-operated extremity: the supine bridging (mean 2.92 vs. 3.51 points, p < 0.001) and prone bridging (mean 2.76 vs. 3.67 points, p < 0.001) tests. Additionally, the summary score of all NEURAC(®) tests significantly differed between extremities (mean 12.08 for the operated vs. 13.67 points for the non-operated extremity, p < 0.001). Myofascial tests (supine and prone bridging) in comparison with a battery of Functional Movement Screen tests seem to be more effective in detecting functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity at the early stage of recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94657652022-09-23 Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Biały, Maciej Kublin, Kamil Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna Gnat, Rafał J Hum Kinet Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) tests can be used to detect functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A total of 83 young and physically active recreational athletes (mean age: 26.9 ± 9.7 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft were evaluated between the 3(rd) and the 4(th) month after surgery. Subjects received a similar, standardised rehabilitation programme. Two experienced raters, blinded to the objective of this study, were involved in functional outcome data collection using myofascial NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen tests. Only two of the NEURAC(®) tests showed significant differences in the results between the operated and the non-operated extremity: the supine bridging (mean 2.92 vs. 3.51 points, p < 0.001) and prone bridging (mean 2.76 vs. 3.67 points, p < 0.001) tests. Additionally, the summary score of all NEURAC(®) tests significantly differed between extremities (mean 12.08 for the operated vs. 13.67 points for the non-operated extremity, p < 0.001). Myofascial tests (supine and prone bridging) in comparison with a battery of Functional Movement Screen tests seem to be more effective in detecting functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity at the early stage of recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sciendo 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9465765/ /pubmed/36157956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052 Text en © 2022 Maciej Biały, Kamil Kublin, Grażyna Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Rafał Gnat, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine Biały, Maciej Kublin, Kamil Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna Gnat, Rafał Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title | Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full | Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_short | Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction |
title_sort | myofascial and movement tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction |
topic | Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT białymaciej myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT kublinkamil myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT brzuszkiewiczkuzmickagrazyna myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction AT gnatrafał myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction |