Cargando…

Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movem...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Biały, Maciej, Kublin, Kamil, Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna, Gnat, Rafał
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Sciendo 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052
_version_ 1784787871852396544
author Biały, Maciej
Kublin, Kamil
Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna
Gnat, Rafał
author_facet Biały, Maciej
Kublin, Kamil
Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna
Gnat, Rafał
author_sort Biały, Maciej
collection PubMed
description Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) tests can be used to detect functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A total of 83 young and physically active recreational athletes (mean age: 26.9 ± 9.7 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft were evaluated between the 3(rd) and the 4(th) month after surgery. Subjects received a similar, standardised rehabilitation programme. Two experienced raters, blinded to the objective of this study, were involved in functional outcome data collection using myofascial NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen tests. Only two of the NEURAC(®) tests showed significant differences in the results between the operated and the non-operated extremity: the supine bridging (mean 2.92 vs. 3.51 points, p < 0.001) and prone bridging (mean 2.76 vs. 3.67 points, p < 0.001) tests. Additionally, the summary score of all NEURAC(®) tests significantly differed between extremities (mean 12.08 for the operated vs. 13.67 points for the non-operated extremity, p < 0.001). Myofascial tests (supine and prone bridging) in comparison with a battery of Functional Movement Screen tests seem to be more effective in detecting functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity at the early stage of recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9465765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Sciendo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94657652022-09-23 Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Biały, Maciej Kublin, Kamil Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna Gnat, Rafał J Hum Kinet Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine Functional evaluation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is one of the key points involved in decision making about the return of patients to full and unrestricted physical activity. The objective of the present study was to verify whether myofascial chain NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen (FMS™) tests can be used to detect functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity in patients after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. A total of 83 young and physically active recreational athletes (mean age: 26.9 ± 9.7 years) who underwent primary single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using an autogenous semitendinosus-gracilis tendon graft were evaluated between the 3(rd) and the 4(th) month after surgery. Subjects received a similar, standardised rehabilitation programme. Two experienced raters, blinded to the objective of this study, were involved in functional outcome data collection using myofascial NEURAC(®) and Functional Movement Screen tests. Only two of the NEURAC(®) tests showed significant differences in the results between the operated and the non-operated extremity: the supine bridging (mean 2.92 vs. 3.51 points, p < 0.001) and prone bridging (mean 2.76 vs. 3.67 points, p < 0.001) tests. Additionally, the summary score of all NEURAC(®) tests significantly differed between extremities (mean 12.08 for the operated vs. 13.67 points for the non-operated extremity, p < 0.001). Myofascial tests (supine and prone bridging) in comparison with a battery of Functional Movement Screen tests seem to be more effective in detecting functional differences between the operated and the non-operated extremity at the early stage of recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Sciendo 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9465765/ /pubmed/36157956 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052 Text en © 2022 Maciej Biały, Kamil Kublin, Grażyna Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Rafał Gnat, published by Sciendo https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
Biały, Maciej
Kublin, Kamil
Brzuszkiewicz-Kuźmicka, Grażyna
Gnat, Rafał
Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short Myofascial and Movement Tests after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort myofascial and movement tests after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Section II - Exercise Physiology & Sports Medicine
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36157956
http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2022-0052
work_keys_str_mv AT białymaciej myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT kublinkamil myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT brzuszkiewiczkuzmickagrazyna myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT gnatrafał myofascialandmovementtestsafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction