Cargando…
Structure–Activity Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors of LSD1 and LSD2
[Image: see text] trans-2-Phenylcycloproylamine (trans-PCPA) has been used as the scaffold to develop covalent-binding inhibitors against lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A), a therapeutic target for several cancers. However, the effects of different structural moieties on the inhibitory acti...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00294 |
_version_ | 1784787876585668608 |
---|---|
author | Niwa, Hideaki Watanabe, Chiduru Sato, Shin Harada, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Hisami Tabusa, Ryo Fukasawa, Shunsuke Shiobara, Ayane Hashimoto, Tomoko Ohno, Osamu Nakamura, Kana Tsuganezawa, Keiko Tanaka, Akiko Shirouzu, Mikako Honma, Teruki Matsuno, Kenji Umehara, Takashi |
author_facet | Niwa, Hideaki Watanabe, Chiduru Sato, Shin Harada, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Hisami Tabusa, Ryo Fukasawa, Shunsuke Shiobara, Ayane Hashimoto, Tomoko Ohno, Osamu Nakamura, Kana Tsuganezawa, Keiko Tanaka, Akiko Shirouzu, Mikako Honma, Teruki Matsuno, Kenji Umehara, Takashi |
author_sort | Niwa, Hideaki |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] trans-2-Phenylcycloproylamine (trans-PCPA) has been used as the scaffold to develop covalent-binding inhibitors against lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A), a therapeutic target for several cancers. However, the effects of different structural moieties on the inhibitory activity, selectivity, and reactivity of these derivatives, including the cis isomers, against LSD1 and its paralogue LSD2/KDM1B are not fully understood. Here we synthesized 65 cis- and trans-PCPA derivatives and evaluated their inhibitory activity against LSD1 and LSD2. One of the derivatives, 7c (cis-4-Br-2,5-F(2)-PCPA; S1024), inhibited LSD1 and LSD2 with K(i) values of 0.094 μM and 8.4 μM, respectively, and increased the level of dimethylated histone H3 at K4 in CCRF-CEM cells. A machine learning-based regression model (Q(2) = 0.61) to predict LSD1-inhibitory activity was also constructed and showed a good prediction accuracy (R(2) = 0.81) for 12 test-set compounds, including 7c. The present methodology would be useful when designing covalent-binding inhibitors for other enzymes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9465824 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94658242022-09-13 Structure–Activity Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors of LSD1 and LSD2 Niwa, Hideaki Watanabe, Chiduru Sato, Shin Harada, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Hisami Tabusa, Ryo Fukasawa, Shunsuke Shiobara, Ayane Hashimoto, Tomoko Ohno, Osamu Nakamura, Kana Tsuganezawa, Keiko Tanaka, Akiko Shirouzu, Mikako Honma, Teruki Matsuno, Kenji Umehara, Takashi ACS Med Chem Lett [Image: see text] trans-2-Phenylcycloproylamine (trans-PCPA) has been used as the scaffold to develop covalent-binding inhibitors against lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1/KDM1A), a therapeutic target for several cancers. However, the effects of different structural moieties on the inhibitory activity, selectivity, and reactivity of these derivatives, including the cis isomers, against LSD1 and its paralogue LSD2/KDM1B are not fully understood. Here we synthesized 65 cis- and trans-PCPA derivatives and evaluated their inhibitory activity against LSD1 and LSD2. One of the derivatives, 7c (cis-4-Br-2,5-F(2)-PCPA; S1024), inhibited LSD1 and LSD2 with K(i) values of 0.094 μM and 8.4 μM, respectively, and increased the level of dimethylated histone H3 at K4 in CCRF-CEM cells. A machine learning-based regression model (Q(2) = 0.61) to predict LSD1-inhibitory activity was also constructed and showed a good prediction accuracy (R(2) = 0.81) for 12 test-set compounds, including 7c. The present methodology would be useful when designing covalent-binding inhibitors for other enzymes. American Chemical Society 2022-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC9465824/ /pubmed/36105323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00294 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Niwa, Hideaki Watanabe, Chiduru Sato, Shin Harada, Toshiyuki Watanabe, Hisami Tabusa, Ryo Fukasawa, Shunsuke Shiobara, Ayane Hashimoto, Tomoko Ohno, Osamu Nakamura, Kana Tsuganezawa, Keiko Tanaka, Akiko Shirouzu, Mikako Honma, Teruki Matsuno, Kenji Umehara, Takashi Structure–Activity Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title | Structure–Activity
Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors
of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title_full | Structure–Activity
Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors
of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title_fullStr | Structure–Activity
Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors
of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Structure–Activity
Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors
of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title_short | Structure–Activity
Relationship and In Silico Evaluation of cis- and trans-PCPA-Derived Inhibitors
of LSD1 and LSD2 |
title_sort | structure–activity
relationship and in silico evaluation of cis- and trans-pcpa-derived inhibitors
of lsd1 and lsd2 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465824/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsmedchemlett.2c00294 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT niwahideaki structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT watanabechiduru structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT satoshin structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT haradatoshiyuki structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT watanabehisami structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT tabusaryo structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT fukasawashunsuke structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT shiobaraayane structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT hashimototomoko structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT ohnoosamu structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT nakamurakana structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT tsuganezawakeiko structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT tanakaakiko structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT shirouzumikako structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT honmateruki structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT matsunokenji structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 AT umeharatakashi structureactivityrelationshipandinsilicoevaluationofcisandtranspcpaderivedinhibitorsoflsd1andlsd2 |