Cargando…

Treatment of inferior pole fracture of the patella with tension-free external immobilization

BACKGROUND: Inferior pole fracture of the patella (IPFP) has small and comminuted fracture blocks that are hard to immobilize, and early mobilization may lead to loss of fracture reduction and immobilization failure. Therefore, a difficulty of treatment is to achieve rigid immobilization with early...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pu, Shaoquan, Chen, Yanling, Liang, Jinlong, Xu, Yongqing, Zhao, Yonghui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9465923/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36096769
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01790-x
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Inferior pole fracture of the patella (IPFP) has small and comminuted fracture blocks that are hard to immobilize, and early mobilization may lead to loss of fracture reduction and immobilization failure. Therefore, a difficulty of treatment is to achieve rigid immobilization with early functional exercise. Here, a new treatment method of tension-free external immobilization is put forward. METHODS: The clinical data of 11 IPFP patients treated with tension-free external immobilization from May 2016 to June 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. There were six males and five females aged 39.0 ± 12.8 years (range 18–53 years). IPFP was caused by traffic accidents in five cases and falls in six cases. All cases had unilateral closed injuries, including four in the left knee and seven in the right knee. The preoperative range of motion of the knee was 22.0 ± 7.5° (10–30°). The time from injury to operation was 4.5 ± 1.3 d (3–7 d). The operation-related indices were recorded, and the function of the affected knee was assessed by the Böstman score. RESULTS: All operations were successful. The operation time was 56.4 ± 8.4 mi (45–70 min), the intraoperative blood loss was 54.1 ± 14.6 mL (40–80 mL), and the length of hospital stay was 7.5 ± 1.9 d (5–11 d). The mean follow-up time was 20.4 ± 7.6 months (12–36 months), the duration of fracture healing was 8.9 ± 1.5 weeks (7–12 weeks), and the removal time of the external immobilization device was 10.4 ± 0.9 weeks (9–12 weeks). At the last follow-up, the range of motion had no significant difference between the affected knee (129.7 ± 3.3°, range 125–135°) and the unaffected knee (130.8 ± 3.8°, range 126–137°) (t = 0.718, p < 0.05). The Böstman score of the knee was 29.2 ± 1.0 points (27–30 points), including 10 excellent cases (90.9%) and one good case (9.1%). CONCLUSION: Tension-free external immobilization is a feasible treatment for IPFP. It can help with early functional exercise and achieve a satisfactory clinical effect.