Cargando…

Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States

Few studies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) have examined facilitators and barriers to self-collecting specimens for extragenital STI screening, and none have evaluated attitudes towards self-collecting hair samples that can be utilized for PrEP drug level testing to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Akshay, Gandhi, Monica, Sallabank, Gregory, Merrill, Leland, Stephenson, Rob
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03846-8
_version_ 1784787969179123712
author Sharma, Akshay
Gandhi, Monica
Sallabank, Gregory
Merrill, Leland
Stephenson, Rob
author_facet Sharma, Akshay
Gandhi, Monica
Sallabank, Gregory
Merrill, Leland
Stephenson, Rob
author_sort Sharma, Akshay
collection PubMed
description Few studies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) have examined facilitators and barriers to self-collecting specimens for extragenital STI screening, and none have evaluated attitudes towards self-collecting hair samples that can be utilized for PrEP drug level testing to assess adherence. To address this gap, we interviewed 25 sexually active GBMSM who were offered a choice to self-collect and return finger-stick blood samples (for actual HIV testing), pharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs and urine specimens (for actual gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), and hair samples (to visually determine their adequacy for PrEP drug level testing): 11 who returned all, 4 who returned some, and 10 who did not return any. Participants found self-collecting finger-stick blood samples and rectal swabs more challenging than other specimens. Frequently discussed facilitators of return included an opportunity to confirm one’s HIV or STI status, limited access to a healthcare provider and a desire to advance research focusing on home-based testing. Commonly cited barriers to return included low self-efficacy pertaining to self-collection and apprehension around the possibility of delay or loss of specimens during transit. Offering additional support such as real-time video conferencing may prove helpful in future field-based research with GBMSM.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9466335
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94663352022-09-12 Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States Sharma, Akshay Gandhi, Monica Sallabank, Gregory Merrill, Leland Stephenson, Rob AIDS Behav Original Paper Few studies among gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) have examined facilitators and barriers to self-collecting specimens for extragenital STI screening, and none have evaluated attitudes towards self-collecting hair samples that can be utilized for PrEP drug level testing to assess adherence. To address this gap, we interviewed 25 sexually active GBMSM who were offered a choice to self-collect and return finger-stick blood samples (for actual HIV testing), pharyngeal swabs, rectal swabs and urine specimens (for actual gonorrhea and chlamydia testing), and hair samples (to visually determine their adequacy for PrEP drug level testing): 11 who returned all, 4 who returned some, and 10 who did not return any. Participants found self-collecting finger-stick blood samples and rectal swabs more challenging than other specimens. Frequently discussed facilitators of return included an opportunity to confirm one’s HIV or STI status, limited access to a healthcare provider and a desire to advance research focusing on home-based testing. Commonly cited barriers to return included low self-efficacy pertaining to self-collection and apprehension around the possibility of delay or loss of specimens during transit. Offering additional support such as real-time video conferencing may prove helpful in future field-based research with GBMSM. Springer US 2022-09-12 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC9466335/ /pubmed/36094639 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03846-8 Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law. This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sharma, Akshay
Gandhi, Monica
Sallabank, Gregory
Merrill, Leland
Stephenson, Rob
Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title_full Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title_fullStr Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title_short Perceptions and Experiences of Returning Self-collected Specimens for HIV, Bacterial STI and Potential PrEP Adherence Testing among Sexual Minority Men in the United States
title_sort perceptions and experiences of returning self-collected specimens for hiv, bacterial sti and potential prep adherence testing among sexual minority men in the united states
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466335/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36094639
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10461-022-03846-8
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmaakshay perceptionsandexperiencesofreturningselfcollectedspecimensforhivbacterialstiandpotentialprepadherencetestingamongsexualminoritymenintheunitedstates
AT gandhimonica perceptionsandexperiencesofreturningselfcollectedspecimensforhivbacterialstiandpotentialprepadherencetestingamongsexualminoritymenintheunitedstates
AT sallabankgregory perceptionsandexperiencesofreturningselfcollectedspecimensforhivbacterialstiandpotentialprepadherencetestingamongsexualminoritymenintheunitedstates
AT merrillleland perceptionsandexperiencesofreturningselfcollectedspecimensforhivbacterialstiandpotentialprepadherencetestingamongsexualminoritymenintheunitedstates
AT stephensonrob perceptionsandexperiencesofreturningselfcollectedspecimensforhivbacterialstiandpotentialprepadherencetestingamongsexualminoritymenintheunitedstates