Cargando…

Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs

BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anandasivam, Balakumar, Tam, Chun Wah Michael, McGeechan, Kevin, Price, Karen, McLean, Katrina, Tracy, Marguerite, Hall, John, Knight, Andrew, Vuong, Kylie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of General Practitioners 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466957/
http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0668
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection and management of high-risk individuals. Melanoma risk-prediction models are available to assist in the identification of high-risk patients but are not routinely used clinically. AIM: To examine how GPs assessed and managed melanoma risk, and the opportunities for using melanoma risk-prediction models in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 Australian GPs. METHOD: GPs who had completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire study on melanoma risk were purposively sampled and recruited. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with Australian GPs between 9 July and 10 September 2019. Interviews were audiorecorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Melanoma risk assessment and its management can be understood as a linear workflow consisting of five clinical process domains with patient selection as the entry point. There was variation between GPs on the identification of melanoma risk factors, melanoma risk estimation, management, and patient education because of intuitive and analytical processes guiding risk assessment, and the influence of patient factors. GPs were largely receptive towards melanoma risk-prediction models, sharing facilitators for and barriers to their potential implementation. CONCLUSION: Further primary care interventions sensitive to existing workflow arrangements may be required to standardise melanoma risk-assessment and management processes.