Cargando…
Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs
BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of General Practitioners
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0668 |
_version_ | 1784788092918431744 |
---|---|
author | Anandasivam, Balakumar Tam, Chun Wah Michael McGeechan, Kevin Price, Karen McLean, Katrina Tracy, Marguerite Hall, John Knight, Andrew Vuong, Kylie |
author_facet | Anandasivam, Balakumar Tam, Chun Wah Michael McGeechan, Kevin Price, Karen McLean, Katrina Tracy, Marguerite Hall, John Knight, Andrew Vuong, Kylie |
author_sort | Anandasivam, Balakumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection and management of high-risk individuals. Melanoma risk-prediction models are available to assist in the identification of high-risk patients but are not routinely used clinically. AIM: To examine how GPs assessed and managed melanoma risk, and the opportunities for using melanoma risk-prediction models in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 Australian GPs. METHOD: GPs who had completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire study on melanoma risk were purposively sampled and recruited. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with Australian GPs between 9 July and 10 September 2019. Interviews were audiorecorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Melanoma risk assessment and its management can be understood as a linear workflow consisting of five clinical process domains with patient selection as the entry point. There was variation between GPs on the identification of melanoma risk factors, melanoma risk estimation, management, and patient education because of intuitive and analytical processes guiding risk assessment, and the influence of patient factors. GPs were largely receptive towards melanoma risk-prediction models, sharing facilitators for and barriers to their potential implementation. CONCLUSION: Further primary care interventions sensitive to existing workflow arrangements may be required to standardise melanoma risk-assessment and management processes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9466957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Royal College of General Practitioners |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94669572022-10-04 Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs Anandasivam, Balakumar Tam, Chun Wah Michael McGeechan, Kevin Price, Karen McLean, Katrina Tracy, Marguerite Hall, John Knight, Andrew Vuong, Kylie Br J Gen Pract Research BACKGROUND: Preventive guidelines for melanoma recommend that patients at high risk of melanoma receive targeted screening; however, this requires careful selection of those at high risk. To the authors’ knowledge, there has been no previous research into how all physicians approach the selection and management of high-risk individuals. Melanoma risk-prediction models are available to assist in the identification of high-risk patients but are not routinely used clinically. AIM: To examine how GPs assessed and managed melanoma risk, and the opportunities for using melanoma risk-prediction models in primary care. DESIGN AND SETTING: Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 20 Australian GPs. METHOD: GPs who had completed a cross-sectional online questionnaire study on melanoma risk were purposively sampled and recruited. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with Australian GPs between 9 July and 10 September 2019. Interviews were audiorecorded, professionally transcribed, and analysed using grounded theory. RESULTS: Melanoma risk assessment and its management can be understood as a linear workflow consisting of five clinical process domains with patient selection as the entry point. There was variation between GPs on the identification of melanoma risk factors, melanoma risk estimation, management, and patient education because of intuitive and analytical processes guiding risk assessment, and the influence of patient factors. GPs were largely receptive towards melanoma risk-prediction models, sharing facilitators for and barriers to their potential implementation. CONCLUSION: Further primary care interventions sensitive to existing workflow arrangements may be required to standardise melanoma risk-assessment and management processes. Royal College of General Practitioners 2022-09-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9466957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0668 Text en © The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This article is Open Access: CC BY 4.0 licence (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ). |
spellingShingle | Research Anandasivam, Balakumar Tam, Chun Wah Michael McGeechan, Kevin Price, Karen McLean, Katrina Tracy, Marguerite Hall, John Knight, Andrew Vuong, Kylie Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title | Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title_full | Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title_fullStr | Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title_full_unstemmed | Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title_short | Melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among Australian GPs |
title_sort | melanoma risk assessment and management: a qualitative study among australian gps |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9466957/ http://dx.doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2021.0668 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anandasivambalakumar melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT tamchunwahmichael melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT mcgeechankevin melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT pricekaren melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT mcleankatrina melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT tracymarguerite melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT halljohn melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT knightandrew melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps AT vuongkylie melanomariskassessmentandmanagementaqualitativestudyamongaustraliangps |