Cargando…

Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level

OBJECTIVE: For an effective control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with vaccines, most people in a population need to be vaccinated. It is thus important to know how to inform the public with reference to individual preferences–while also acknowledging the societal preference to encourage vaccinations....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebitschek, Felix G., Ellermann, Christin, Jenny, Mirjam A., Siegel, Nico A., Spinner, Christian, Wagner, Gert G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36095020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274186
_version_ 1784788175702458368
author Rebitschek, Felix G.
Ellermann, Christin
Jenny, Mirjam A.
Siegel, Nico A.
Spinner, Christian
Wagner, Gert G.
author_facet Rebitschek, Felix G.
Ellermann, Christin
Jenny, Mirjam A.
Siegel, Nico A.
Spinner, Christian
Wagner, Gert G.
author_sort Rebitschek, Felix G.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: For an effective control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with vaccines, most people in a population need to be vaccinated. It is thus important to know how to inform the public with reference to individual preferences–while also acknowledging the societal preference to encourage vaccinations. According to the health care standard of informed decision-making, a comparison of the benefits and harms of (not) having the vaccination would be required to inform undecided and skeptical people. To test evidence-based fact boxes, an established risk communication format, and to inform their development, we investigated their contribution to knowledge and evaluations of COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: We conducted four studies (1, 2, and 4 were population-wide surveys with N = 1,942 to N = 6,056): Study 1 assessed the relationship between vaccination knowledge and intentions in Germany over three months. Study 2 assessed respective information gaps and needs of the population in Germany. In parallel, an experiment (Study 3) with a mixed design (presentation formats; pre-post-comparison) assessed the effect of fact boxes on risk perceptions and fear, using a convenience sample (N = 719). Study 4 examined how effective two fact box formats are for informing vaccination intentions, with a mixed experimental design: between-subjects (presentation formats) and within-subjects (pre-post-comparison). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that vaccination knowledge and vaccination intentions increased between November 2020 and February 2021. Study 2 revealed objective information requirements and subjective information needs. Study 3 showed that the fact box format is effective in adjusting risk perceptions concerning COVID-19. Based on those results, fact boxes were revised and implemented with the help of a national health authority in Germany. Study 4 showed that simple fact boxes increase vaccination knowledge and positive evaluations in skeptics and undecideds. CONCLUSION: Fact boxes can inform COVID-19 vaccination intentions of undecided and skeptical people without threatening societal vaccination goals of the population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9467356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94673562022-09-13 Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level Rebitschek, Felix G. Ellermann, Christin Jenny, Mirjam A. Siegel, Nico A. Spinner, Christian Wagner, Gert G. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: For an effective control of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic with vaccines, most people in a population need to be vaccinated. It is thus important to know how to inform the public with reference to individual preferences–while also acknowledging the societal preference to encourage vaccinations. According to the health care standard of informed decision-making, a comparison of the benefits and harms of (not) having the vaccination would be required to inform undecided and skeptical people. To test evidence-based fact boxes, an established risk communication format, and to inform their development, we investigated their contribution to knowledge and evaluations of COVID-19 vaccines. METHODS: We conducted four studies (1, 2, and 4 were population-wide surveys with N = 1,942 to N = 6,056): Study 1 assessed the relationship between vaccination knowledge and intentions in Germany over three months. Study 2 assessed respective information gaps and needs of the population in Germany. In parallel, an experiment (Study 3) with a mixed design (presentation formats; pre-post-comparison) assessed the effect of fact boxes on risk perceptions and fear, using a convenience sample (N = 719). Study 4 examined how effective two fact box formats are for informing vaccination intentions, with a mixed experimental design: between-subjects (presentation formats) and within-subjects (pre-post-comparison). RESULTS: Study 1 showed that vaccination knowledge and vaccination intentions increased between November 2020 and February 2021. Study 2 revealed objective information requirements and subjective information needs. Study 3 showed that the fact box format is effective in adjusting risk perceptions concerning COVID-19. Based on those results, fact boxes were revised and implemented with the help of a national health authority in Germany. Study 4 showed that simple fact boxes increase vaccination knowledge and positive evaluations in skeptics and undecideds. CONCLUSION: Fact boxes can inform COVID-19 vaccination intentions of undecided and skeptical people without threatening societal vaccination goals of the population. Public Library of Science 2022-09-12 /pmc/articles/PMC9467356/ /pubmed/36095020 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274186 Text en © 2022 Rebitschek et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rebitschek, Felix G.
Ellermann, Christin
Jenny, Mirjam A.
Siegel, Nico A.
Spinner, Christian
Wagner, Gert G.
Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title_full Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title_fullStr Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title_full_unstemmed Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title_short Fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of COVID-19 vaccinations at the population level
title_sort fact boxes that inform individual decisions may contribute to a more positive evaluation of covid-19 vaccinations at the population level
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36095020
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274186
work_keys_str_mv AT rebitschekfelixg factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel
AT ellermannchristin factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel
AT jennymirjama factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel
AT siegelnicoa factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel
AT spinnerchristian factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel
AT wagnergertg factboxesthatinformindividualdecisionsmaycontributetoamorepositiveevaluationofcovid19vaccinationsatthepopulationlevel