Cargando…

Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery

Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Garrett G.R.J., Robertson, Reagan L., Vergis, Ashley
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: CMA Impact Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021
_version_ 1784788199296466944
author Johnson, Garrett G.R.J.
Robertson, Reagan L.
Vergis, Ashley
author_facet Johnson, Garrett G.R.J.
Robertson, Reagan L.
Vergis, Ashley
author_sort Johnson, Garrett G.R.J.
collection PubMed
description Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it would be helpful to standardize the way TES is reported. Synoptic operative reports have previously been established as an effective and efficient communication tool. For patients with rectal cancer, synoptic reports are required for pathology, radiology and major oncologic resections, but never previously for TES. We used a Delphi process including 15 stakeholders from across Canada to develop a TES synoptic report. Participants submitted items according to 6 categories: team characteristics, patient demographics, preoperative work-up, lesion characteristics, procedure details and postoperative details. Twenty-six surgeon-entered and 41 auto-populated items reached final inclusion. This will allow generation of a synoptic reporting template to improve perioperative communication for these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9467464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher CMA Impact Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94674642022-09-16 Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. Robertson, Reagan L. Vergis, Ashley Can J Surg Discussions in Surgery Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it would be helpful to standardize the way TES is reported. Synoptic operative reports have previously been established as an effective and efficient communication tool. For patients with rectal cancer, synoptic reports are required for pathology, radiology and major oncologic resections, but never previously for TES. We used a Delphi process including 15 stakeholders from across Canada to develop a TES synoptic report. Participants submitted items according to 6 categories: team characteristics, patient demographics, preoperative work-up, lesion characteristics, procedure details and postoperative details. Twenty-six surgeon-entered and 41 auto-populated items reached final inclusion. This will allow generation of a synoptic reporting template to improve perioperative communication for these patients. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9467464/ /pubmed/36302129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
spellingShingle Discussions in Surgery
Johnson, Garrett G.R.J.
Robertson, Reagan L.
Vergis, Ashley
Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title_full Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title_fullStr Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title_full_unstemmed Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title_short Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
title_sort quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
topic Discussions in Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302129
http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsongarrettgrj qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery
AT robertsonreaganl qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery
AT vergisashley qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery