Cargando…
Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery
Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it wo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
CMA Impact Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021 |
_version_ | 1784788199296466944 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. Robertson, Reagan L. Vergis, Ashley |
author_facet | Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. Robertson, Reagan L. Vergis, Ashley |
author_sort | Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it would be helpful to standardize the way TES is reported. Synoptic operative reports have previously been established as an effective and efficient communication tool. For patients with rectal cancer, synoptic reports are required for pathology, radiology and major oncologic resections, but never previously for TES. We used a Delphi process including 15 stakeholders from across Canada to develop a TES synoptic report. Participants submitted items according to 6 categories: team characteristics, patient demographics, preoperative work-up, lesion characteristics, procedure details and postoperative details. Twenty-six surgeon-entered and 41 auto-populated items reached final inclusion. This will allow generation of a synoptic reporting template to improve perioperative communication for these patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9467464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | CMA Impact Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94674642022-09-16 Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. Robertson, Reagan L. Vergis, Ashley Can J Surg Discussions in Surgery Transanal endoscopic surgery (TES) platforms have become quite popular. Many surgeons across the country have begun excising rectal lesions using these platforms; however, the perioperative decision-making surrounding these excisions can be quite variable. To facilitate care between providers, it would be helpful to standardize the way TES is reported. Synoptic operative reports have previously been established as an effective and efficient communication tool. For patients with rectal cancer, synoptic reports are required for pathology, radiology and major oncologic resections, but never previously for TES. We used a Delphi process including 15 stakeholders from across Canada to develop a TES synoptic report. Participants submitted items according to 6 categories: team characteristics, patient demographics, preoperative work-up, lesion characteristics, procedure details and postoperative details. Twenty-six surgeon-entered and 41 auto-populated items reached final inclusion. This will allow generation of a synoptic reporting template to improve perioperative communication for these patients. CMA Impact Inc. 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9467464/ /pubmed/36302129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021 Text en © 2022 CMA Impact Inc. or its licensors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) licence, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original publication is properly cited, the use is noncommercial (i.e., research or educational use), and no modifications or adaptations are made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Discussions in Surgery Johnson, Garrett G.R.J. Robertson, Reagan L. Vergis, Ashley Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title | Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title_full | Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title_fullStr | Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title_short | Quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
title_sort | quality indicators for operative reporting in transanal endoscopic surgery |
topic | Discussions in Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36302129 http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cjs.020021 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsongarrettgrj qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery AT robertsonreaganl qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery AT vergisashley qualityindicatorsforoperativereportingintransanalendoscopicsurgery |