Cargando…

Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea

BACKGROUND: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Yoonjung, Park, Inho, Kim, Boyeon, Choi, Yu Jeong, Oh, Seoung Chul, Lee, Kyung-A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.64
_version_ 1784788279213686784
author Kim, Yoonjung
Park, Inho
Kim, Boyeon
Choi, Yu Jeong
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
author_facet Kim, Yoonjung
Park, Inho
Kim, Boyeon
Choi, Yu Jeong
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
author_sort Kim, Yoonjung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As locally adopted multigene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays for selecting PARP inhibitor candidates have not been thoroughly evaluated, we compared the analytical performance of the FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) (central laboratory) and other NGS assays (local laboratory) with samples from the PROfound trial in Korea. METHODS: One hundred PROfound samples (60 HRR mutation [HRRm] cases and 40 non-HRRm cases) were analyzed. The results of HRR gene mutation analysis were compared between the FoundationOne CDx and two other NGS assays [SureSelect Custom Design assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Oncomine Comprehensive assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)]. RESULTS: The positive percent agreement for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (indels) between the central laboratory and local laboratory was 98.7%–100.0%. The negative percent agreement and overall percent agreement (OPA) for SNVs and indels between central and local laboratories were both 100%. Compared with that of the FoundationOne CDx assay, the OPA for copy number variations of the Oncomine Comprehensive and SureSelect Custom assays reached 99.8%–100%. Most mCRPC patients harboring a deleterious genetic variant were successfully identified with both local laboratory assays. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS approach at a local laboratory showed comparable analytical performance for identifying HRRm status to the FoundationOne CDx assay used at the central laboratory.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9467836
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94678362022-12-26 Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea Kim, Yoonjung Park, Inho Kim, Boyeon Choi, Yu Jeong Oh, Seoung Chul Lee, Kyung-A Ann Lab Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Following success of the phase III PROfound trial, the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor olaparib was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration in May 2020 for adult patients with deleterious homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene-mutated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As locally adopted multigene panel next-generation sequencing (NGS) assays for selecting PARP inhibitor candidates have not been thoroughly evaluated, we compared the analytical performance of the FoundationOne CDx (Foundation Medicine, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA) (central laboratory) and other NGS assays (local laboratory) with samples from the PROfound trial in Korea. METHODS: One hundred PROfound samples (60 HRR mutation [HRRm] cases and 40 non-HRRm cases) were analyzed. The results of HRR gene mutation analysis were compared between the FoundationOne CDx and two other NGS assays [SureSelect Custom Design assay (Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USA) and Oncomine Comprehensive assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA)]. RESULTS: The positive percent agreement for single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and insertion/deletions (indels) between the central laboratory and local laboratory was 98.7%–100.0%. The negative percent agreement and overall percent agreement (OPA) for SNVs and indels between central and local laboratories were both 100%. Compared with that of the FoundationOne CDx assay, the OPA for copy number variations of the Oncomine Comprehensive and SureSelect Custom assays reached 99.8%–100%. Most mCRPC patients harboring a deleterious genetic variant were successfully identified with both local laboratory assays. CONCLUSIONS: The NGS approach at a local laboratory showed comparable analytical performance for identifying HRRm status to the FoundationOne CDx assay used at the central laboratory. Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2023-01-01 2022-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9467836/ /pubmed/36045058 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.64 Text en © Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Kim, Yoonjung
Park, Inho
Kim, Boyeon
Choi, Yu Jeong
Oh, Seoung Chul
Lee, Kyung-A
Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title_full Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title_fullStr Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title_short Comparison of Homologous Recombination Repair Gene Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Between Local and Central Laboratories in Korea
title_sort comparison of homologous recombination repair gene next-generation sequencing analysis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer between local and central laboratories in korea
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467836/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36045058
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2023.43.1.64
work_keys_str_mv AT kimyoonjung comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea
AT parkinho comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea
AT kimboyeon comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea
AT choiyujeong comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea
AT ohseoungchul comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea
AT leekyunga comparisonofhomologousrecombinationrepairgenenextgenerationsequencinganalysisinpatientswithmetastaticcastrationresistantprostatecancerbetweenlocalandcentrallaboratoriesinkorea