Cargando…
Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box?
INTRODUCTION: Magnetic interaction of portable electronic devices (PEDs), such as state-of-the art mobile phones, with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has been reported. The aim of the study was to quantify the magnetic fields of latest generation smartwatches and other PEDs an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36111261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101122 |
_version_ | 1784788292177231872 |
---|---|
author | Badertscher, Patrick Vergne, Céline Féry, Corentin Mannhart, Diego Quirin, Thomas Osswald, Stefan Kühne, Michael Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Pascal, Joris |
author_facet | Badertscher, Patrick Vergne, Céline Féry, Corentin Mannhart, Diego Quirin, Thomas Osswald, Stefan Kühne, Michael Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Pascal, Joris |
author_sort | Badertscher, Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Magnetic interaction of portable electronic devices (PEDs), such as state-of-the art mobile phones, with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has been reported. The aim of the study was to quantify the magnetic fields of latest generation smartwatches and other PEDs and to evaluate and predict their risk of CIED interactions. METHODS: High resolution magnetic field characterization of five smartwatches (Apple Watch 6/7, Fitbit Sense, Samsung Galaxy 3, Withings Scanwatch) was performed using a novel magnetic field camera. Ex vivo measurements of the minimal safety distance (MSD) at which no mode switch can be observed were performed between 11 PEDs and six representative CIEDs. RESULTS: Maximal 1 mT distances ranged between 10 mm (Withings) and 19 mm (Fitbit and AppleWatch), and 1 mT volumes between 6 cm(3) (Withings) and 19 cm(3) (Fitbit). All these measures were observed only for the back side of the smartwatches. While most smartwatches with measured 1 mT distance < 15 mm posed low ex vivo interaction within a distance of < 10 mm, PEDs such as electronic pens and in-ear-headphones with measured 1 mT distance > 15 mm showed device interaction up to > 15 mm. Linear regression analysis showed a linear relationship of the MSD with 1 mT distance (B coefficient: 0.46; 95 %-CI: 0.25–0.67, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Smartwatches are safer compared to other PEDs such as electronic pens or in-ear headphones with regards to CIED interaction. With a standardized magnetic field camera, the risk assessment of CIED interaction of novel PEDs is feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9467892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94678922022-09-14 Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? Badertscher, Patrick Vergne, Céline Féry, Corentin Mannhart, Diego Quirin, Thomas Osswald, Stefan Kühne, Michael Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Pascal, Joris Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc Original Paper INTRODUCTION: Magnetic interaction of portable electronic devices (PEDs), such as state-of-the art mobile phones, with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has been reported. The aim of the study was to quantify the magnetic fields of latest generation smartwatches and other PEDs and to evaluate and predict their risk of CIED interactions. METHODS: High resolution magnetic field characterization of five smartwatches (Apple Watch 6/7, Fitbit Sense, Samsung Galaxy 3, Withings Scanwatch) was performed using a novel magnetic field camera. Ex vivo measurements of the minimal safety distance (MSD) at which no mode switch can be observed were performed between 11 PEDs and six representative CIEDs. RESULTS: Maximal 1 mT distances ranged between 10 mm (Withings) and 19 mm (Fitbit and AppleWatch), and 1 mT volumes between 6 cm(3) (Withings) and 19 cm(3) (Fitbit). All these measures were observed only for the back side of the smartwatches. While most smartwatches with measured 1 mT distance < 15 mm posed low ex vivo interaction within a distance of < 10 mm, PEDs such as electronic pens and in-ear-headphones with measured 1 mT distance > 15 mm showed device interaction up to > 15 mm. Linear regression analysis showed a linear relationship of the MSD with 1 mT distance (B coefficient: 0.46; 95 %-CI: 0.25–0.67, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Smartwatches are safer compared to other PEDs such as electronic pens or in-ear headphones with regards to CIED interaction. With a standardized magnetic field camera, the risk assessment of CIED interaction of novel PEDs is feasible. Elsevier 2022-09-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9467892/ /pubmed/36111261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101122 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Paper Badertscher, Patrick Vergne, Céline Féry, Corentin Mannhart, Diego Quirin, Thomas Osswald, Stefan Kühne, Michael Sticherling, Christian Knecht, Sven Pascal, Joris Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title | Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title_full | Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title_fullStr | Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title_full_unstemmed | Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title_short | Magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with CIEDs – Did we open a Pandora’s box? |
title_sort | magnetic field interactions of smartwatches and portable electronic devices with cieds – did we open a pandora’s box? |
topic | Original Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9467892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36111261 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101122 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT badertscherpatrick magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT vergneceline magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT ferycorentin magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT mannhartdiego magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT quirinthomas magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT osswaldstefan magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT kuhnemichael magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT sticherlingchristian magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT knechtsven magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox AT pascaljoris magneticfieldinteractionsofsmartwatchesandportableelectronicdeviceswithciedsdidweopenapandorasbox |