Cargando…

Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE: Blood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fadel, Michael G, Patel, Ishaan, O’Leary, Lawrence, Behar, Nebil, Brewer, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35779099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x
_version_ 1784788325222055936
author Fadel, Michael G
Patel, Ishaan
O’Leary, Lawrence
Behar, Nebil
Brewer, James
author_facet Fadel, Michael G
Patel, Ishaan
O’Leary, Lawrence
Behar, Nebil
Brewer, James
author_sort Fadel, Michael G
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Blood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of perioperative blood transfusion. METHODS: Studies from January 1990 to June 2021 assessing the requirement of preoperative G&S testing for elective or emergency cholecystectomy and appendectomy were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search was performed on 6th July 2021 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021267967). Number of patients, co-morbidities, operation performed, number of patients that underwent preoperative G&S testing, perioperative transfusion rates and financial costs were extracted. RESULTS: We initially screened 194 studies of which 15 retrospective studies, a total of 477,437 patients, specifically met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cholecystectomy, two studies on appendectomy and three studies included both procedures. Where reported, a total of 177,539/469,342 (37.8%) patients underwent preoperative G&S testing with a perioperative transfusion rate of 2.1% (range 0.0 to 2.1%). The main preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion identified include cardiovascular co-morbidity, coagulopathy, anaemia and haematological malignancy. All 15 studies concluded that routine G&S is not warranted. CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that G&S is not necessarily required for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy. Having a targeted G&S approach would reduce delays in elective and emergency lists, reduce the burden on the blood transfusion service and have financial implications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9468044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94680442022-09-14 Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review Fadel, Michael G Patel, Ishaan O’Leary, Lawrence Behar, Nebil Brewer, James Langenbecks Arch Surg Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses PURPOSE: Blood typing, or group and save (G&S) testing, is commonly performed prior to cholecystectomy and appendectomy in many hospitals. In order to determine whether G&S testing is required prior to these procedures, we set out to evaluate the relevant literature and associated rates of perioperative blood transfusion. METHODS: Studies from January 1990 to June 2021 assessing the requirement of preoperative G&S testing for elective or emergency cholecystectomy and appendectomy were retrieved from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL databases. The search was performed on 6th July 2021 (PROSPERO registration number CRD42021267967). Number of patients, co-morbidities, operation performed, number of patients that underwent preoperative G&S testing, perioperative transfusion rates and financial costs were extracted. RESULTS: We initially screened 194 studies of which 15 retrospective studies, a total of 477,437 patients, specifically met the inclusion criteria. Ten studies reported on cholecystectomy, two studies on appendectomy and three studies included both procedures. Where reported, a total of 177,539/469,342 (37.8%) patients underwent preoperative G&S testing with a perioperative transfusion rate of 2.1% (range 0.0 to 2.1%). The main preoperative risk factors associated with perioperative blood transfusion identified include cardiovascular co-morbidity, coagulopathy, anaemia and haematological malignancy. All 15 studies concluded that routine G&S is not warranted. CONCLUSION: The current evidence suggests that G&S is not necessarily required for all patients undergoing cholecystectomy or appendectomy. Having a targeted G&S approach would reduce delays in elective and emergency lists, reduce the burden on the blood transfusion service and have financial implications. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-07-02 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9468044/ /pubmed/35779099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Fadel, Michael G
Patel, Ishaan
O’Leary, Lawrence
Behar, Nebil
Brewer, James
Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title_full Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title_fullStr Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title_short Requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
title_sort requirement of preoperative blood typing for cholecystectomy and appendectomy: a systematic review
topic Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35779099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00423-022-02600-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fadelmichaelg requirementofpreoperativebloodtypingforcholecystectomyandappendectomyasystematicreview
AT patelishaan requirementofpreoperativebloodtypingforcholecystectomyandappendectomyasystematicreview
AT olearylawrence requirementofpreoperativebloodtypingforcholecystectomyandappendectomyasystematicreview
AT beharnebil requirementofpreoperativebloodtypingforcholecystectomyandappendectomyasystematicreview
AT brewerjames requirementofpreoperativebloodtypingforcholecystectomyandappendectomyasystematicreview