Cargando…

Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery cases are becoming more complex and increasingly require invasive video-EEG monitoring (VEM) with intracranial subdural or intracerebral electrodes, exposing patients to substantial risks. We assessed the utility and safety of using foramen ovale (FO) and epidural peg el...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miron, Gadi, Dehnicke, Christoph, Meencke, Heinz-Joachim, Onken, Julia, Holtkamp, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11208-6
_version_ 1784788328711716864
author Miron, Gadi
Dehnicke, Christoph
Meencke, Heinz-Joachim
Onken, Julia
Holtkamp, Martin
author_facet Miron, Gadi
Dehnicke, Christoph
Meencke, Heinz-Joachim
Onken, Julia
Holtkamp, Martin
author_sort Miron, Gadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery cases are becoming more complex and increasingly require invasive video-EEG monitoring (VEM) with intracranial subdural or intracerebral electrodes, exposing patients to substantial risks. We assessed the utility and safety of using foramen ovale (FO) and epidural peg electrodes (FOP) as a next step diagnostic approach following scalp VEM. METHODS: We analyzed clinical, electrophysiological, and imaging characteristics of 180 consecutive patients that underwent FOP VEM between 1996 and 2021. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of clinical and electrophysiological outcomes. RESULTS: FOP VEM allowed for immediate resection recommendation in 36 patients (20.0%) and excluded this option in 85 (47.2%). Fifty-nine (32.8%) patients required additional invasive EEG investigations; however, only eight with bilateral recordings. FOP VEM identified the ictal onset in 137 patients, compared to 96 during prior scalp VEM, p = .004. Predictors for determination of ictal onset were temporal lobe epilepsy (OR 2.9, p = .03) and lesional imaging (OR 3.1, p = .01). Predictors for surgery recommendation were temporal lobe epilepsy (OR 6.8, p < .001), FO seizure onset (OR 6.1, p = .002), and unilateral interictal epileptic activity (OR 3.8, p = .02). One-year postsurgical seizure freedom (53.3% of patients) was predicted by FO ictal onset (OR 5.8, p = .01). Two patients experienced intracerebral bleeding without persisting neurologic sequelae. CONCLUSION: FOP VEM adds clinically significant electrophysiological information leading to treatment decisions in two-thirds of cases with a good benefit–risk profile. Predictors identified for electrophysiological and clinical outcome can assist in optimally selecting patients for this safe diagnostic approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11208-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9468058
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94680582022-09-14 Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective Miron, Gadi Dehnicke, Christoph Meencke, Heinz-Joachim Onken, Julia Holtkamp, Martin J Neurol Original Communication BACKGROUND: Epilepsy surgery cases are becoming more complex and increasingly require invasive video-EEG monitoring (VEM) with intracranial subdural or intracerebral electrodes, exposing patients to substantial risks. We assessed the utility and safety of using foramen ovale (FO) and epidural peg electrodes (FOP) as a next step diagnostic approach following scalp VEM. METHODS: We analyzed clinical, electrophysiological, and imaging characteristics of 180 consecutive patients that underwent FOP VEM between 1996 and 2021. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess predictors of clinical and electrophysiological outcomes. RESULTS: FOP VEM allowed for immediate resection recommendation in 36 patients (20.0%) and excluded this option in 85 (47.2%). Fifty-nine (32.8%) patients required additional invasive EEG investigations; however, only eight with bilateral recordings. FOP VEM identified the ictal onset in 137 patients, compared to 96 during prior scalp VEM, p = .004. Predictors for determination of ictal onset were temporal lobe epilepsy (OR 2.9, p = .03) and lesional imaging (OR 3.1, p = .01). Predictors for surgery recommendation were temporal lobe epilepsy (OR 6.8, p < .001), FO seizure onset (OR 6.1, p = .002), and unilateral interictal epileptic activity (OR 3.8, p = .02). One-year postsurgical seizure freedom (53.3% of patients) was predicted by FO ictal onset (OR 5.8, p = .01). Two patients experienced intracerebral bleeding without persisting neurologic sequelae. CONCLUSION: FOP VEM adds clinically significant electrophysiological information leading to treatment decisions in two-thirds of cases with a good benefit–risk profile. Predictors identified for electrophysiological and clinical outcome can assist in optimally selecting patients for this safe diagnostic approach. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00415-022-11208-6. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-15 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9468058/ /pubmed/35705881 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11208-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Communication
Miron, Gadi
Dehnicke, Christoph
Meencke, Heinz-Joachim
Onken, Julia
Holtkamp, Martin
Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title_full Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title_fullStr Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title_full_unstemmed Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title_short Presurgical video-EEG monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
title_sort presurgical video-eeg monitoring with foramen ovale and epidural peg electrodes: a 25-year perspective
topic Original Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468058/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35705881
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00415-022-11208-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mirongadi presurgicalvideoeegmonitoringwithforamenovaleandepiduralpegelectrodesa25yearperspective
AT dehnickechristoph presurgicalvideoeegmonitoringwithforamenovaleandepiduralpegelectrodesa25yearperspective
AT meenckeheinzjoachim presurgicalvideoeegmonitoringwithforamenovaleandepiduralpegelectrodesa25yearperspective
AT onkenjulia presurgicalvideoeegmonitoringwithforamenovaleandepiduralpegelectrodesa25yearperspective
AT holtkampmartin presurgicalvideoeegmonitoringwithforamenovaleandepiduralpegelectrodesa25yearperspective