Cargando…
Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure
We studied object–location binding in pigeons using a sequence learning procedure. A sequence of four objects was presented, one at a time at one of four locations on a touchscreen. A single peck at the object ended the trial, and food reinforcement was delivered intermittently. In Experiment 1, a b...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00521-9 |
_version_ | 1784788338008391680 |
---|---|
author | Blaisdell, Aaron P. Schroeder, Julia E. |
author_facet | Blaisdell, Aaron P. Schroeder, Julia E. |
author_sort | Blaisdell, Aaron P. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We studied object–location binding in pigeons using a sequence learning procedure. A sequence of four objects was presented, one at a time at one of four locations on a touchscreen. A single peck at the object ended the trial, and food reinforcement was delivered intermittently. In Experiment 1, a between-subjects design was used to present objects, locations, or both in a regular sequence or randomly. Response time costs on nonreinforced probe tests on which object order, location order, or both were disrupted revealed sequence learning effects. Pigeons encoded location order when it was consistent, but not object order when it alone was consistent. When both were consistent, pigeons encoded both, and showed evidence of object–location binding. In Experiment 2, two groups of pigeons received training on sequences where the same object always appeared at the same location. For some pigeons a consistent sequence was used while for others sequence order was randomized. Only when sequence order was consistent was object–location binding found. These experiments are the first demonstrations of strong and lasting feature binding in pigeons and are consistent with a functional account of learning. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9468098 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94680982022-09-14 Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure Blaisdell, Aaron P. Schroeder, Julia E. Learn Behav Article We studied object–location binding in pigeons using a sequence learning procedure. A sequence of four objects was presented, one at a time at one of four locations on a touchscreen. A single peck at the object ended the trial, and food reinforcement was delivered intermittently. In Experiment 1, a between-subjects design was used to present objects, locations, or both in a regular sequence or randomly. Response time costs on nonreinforced probe tests on which object order, location order, or both were disrupted revealed sequence learning effects. Pigeons encoded location order when it was consistent, but not object order when it alone was consistent. When both were consistent, pigeons encoded both, and showed evidence of object–location binding. In Experiment 2, two groups of pigeons received training on sequences where the same object always appeared at the same location. For some pigeons a consistent sequence was used while for others sequence order was randomized. Only when sequence order was consistent was object–location binding found. These experiments are the first demonstrations of strong and lasting feature binding in pigeons and are consistent with a functional account of learning. Springer US 2022-04-04 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9468098/ /pubmed/35378692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00521-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Blaisdell, Aaron P. Schroeder, Julia E. Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title | Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title_full | Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title_fullStr | Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title_short | Evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
title_sort | evidence for object–place binding in pigeons in a sequence-learning procedure |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35378692 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/s13420-022-00521-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT blaisdellaaronp evidenceforobjectplacebindinginpigeonsinasequencelearningprocedure AT schroederjuliae evidenceforobjectplacebindinginpigeonsinasequencelearningprocedure |