Cargando…
Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy
BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) are administered chronic intravenous inotropic support (CIIS) as bridge to surgical therapy; some ultimately never receive surgery. We aimed to describe reasons patients “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy, and comp...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.918146 |
_version_ | 1784788421891325952 |
---|---|
author | Rao, Anirudh Singh, Manavotam Maini, Mansi Anderson, Kelley M. Crowell, Nancy A. Henderson, Paul R. Gholami, Sherry S. Sheikh, Farooq H. Najjar, Samer S. Groninger, Hunter |
author_facet | Rao, Anirudh Singh, Manavotam Maini, Mansi Anderson, Kelley M. Crowell, Nancy A. Henderson, Paul R. Gholami, Sherry S. Sheikh, Farooq H. Najjar, Samer S. Groninger, Hunter |
author_sort | Rao, Anirudh |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) are administered chronic intravenous inotropic support (CIIS) as bridge to surgical therapy; some ultimately never receive surgery. We aimed to describe reasons patients “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy, and compare end-of-life outcomes to patients initiated on CIIS as palliative therapy. METHODS: Single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients on CIIS as bridge or palliative therapy between 2010 and 2016; data obtained through review of health records and multi-disciplinary selection meeting minutes, was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Of 246 patients discharged on CIIS as bridge therapy, 37 (16%) (male n = 28, 76%; African American n = 22, 60%) ultimately never received surgery. 67 matched patients on CIIS as palliative therapy were included for analysis (male n = 47, 70%; African American n = 47, 70%). The most common reasons for “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy were frailty (n = 10, 27%), cardiac arrest (n = 5, 13.5%), and progressive non-cardiac illnesses (n = 6, 16.2%). A similar percentage of patients in the bridge (n = 28, 76%) and palliative (n = 48, 72%) groups died outside the hospital (P=0.66); however, fewer bridge patients received hospice care compared to the palliative group (35% vs 69%, P < 0.001). Comparing patients who died in the hospital, bridge patients (n = 9; 100%) were more likely to die in the intensive care unit than palliative patients (n = 8; 42%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients on CIIS as bridge therapy who do not ultimately receive surgical therapy “crossover” to palliative intention due to frailty, or development of or identification of serious illnesses. Nevertheless, these “bridge to nowhere” patients are less likely to receive palliative care or hospice and more likely to die in the intensive care unit than patients on CIIS as palliative therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9468486 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94684862022-09-14 Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy Rao, Anirudh Singh, Manavotam Maini, Mansi Anderson, Kelley M. Crowell, Nancy A. Henderson, Paul R. Gholami, Sherry S. Sheikh, Farooq H. Najjar, Samer S. Groninger, Hunter Front Cardiovasc Med Cardiovascular Medicine BACKGROUND: Many patients with advanced heart failure (HF) are administered chronic intravenous inotropic support (CIIS) as bridge to surgical therapy; some ultimately never receive surgery. We aimed to describe reasons patients “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy, and compare end-of-life outcomes to patients initiated on CIIS as palliative therapy. METHODS: Single-institution, retrospective cohort study of patients on CIIS as bridge or palliative therapy between 2010 and 2016; data obtained through review of health records and multi-disciplinary selection meeting minutes, was analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. RESULTS: Of 246 patients discharged on CIIS as bridge therapy, 37 (16%) (male n = 28, 76%; African American n = 22, 60%) ultimately never received surgery. 67 matched patients on CIIS as palliative therapy were included for analysis (male n = 47, 70%; African American n = 47, 70%). The most common reasons for “crossover” from CIIS as bridge therapy to palliative therapy were frailty (n = 10, 27%), cardiac arrest (n = 5, 13.5%), and progressive non-cardiac illnesses (n = 6, 16.2%). A similar percentage of patients in the bridge (n = 28, 76%) and palliative (n = 48, 72%) groups died outside the hospital (P=0.66); however, fewer bridge patients received hospice care compared to the palliative group (35% vs 69%, P < 0.001). Comparing patients who died in the hospital, bridge patients (n = 9; 100%) were more likely to die in the intensive care unit than palliative patients (n = 8; 42%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients on CIIS as bridge therapy who do not ultimately receive surgical therapy “crossover” to palliative intention due to frailty, or development of or identification of serious illnesses. Nevertheless, these “bridge to nowhere” patients are less likely to receive palliative care or hospice and more likely to die in the intensive care unit than patients on CIIS as palliative therapy. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC9468486/ /pubmed/36110411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.918146 Text en Copyright © 2022 Rao, Singh, Maini, Anderson, Crowell, Henderson, Gholami, Sheikh, Najjar and Groninger. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Cardiovascular Medicine Rao, Anirudh Singh, Manavotam Maini, Mansi Anderson, Kelley M. Crowell, Nancy A. Henderson, Paul R. Gholami, Sherry S. Sheikh, Farooq H. Najjar, Samer S. Groninger, Hunter Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title | Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title_full | Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title_fullStr | Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title_short | Bridge to nowhere: A retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
title_sort | bridge to nowhere: a retrospective single-center study on patients using chronic intravenous inotropic support as bridge therapy who do not receive surgical therapy |
topic | Cardiovascular Medicine |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468486/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2022.918146 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raoanirudh bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT singhmanavotam bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT mainimansi bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT andersonkelleym bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT crowellnancya bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT hendersonpaulr bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT gholamisherrys bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT sheikhfarooqh bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT najjarsamers bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy AT groningerhunter bridgetonowherearetrospectivesinglecenterstudyonpatientsusingchronicintravenousinotropicsupportasbridgetherapywhodonotreceivesurgicaltherapy |