Cargando…
Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare
Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have disrupted many supply chains by making new designs and functionalities possible. The opportunity to realize complex customized structures has led to significant interest within healthcare; however, full utilization critically requires the alignment of th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105128 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i3.586 |
_version_ | 1784788533185085440 |
---|---|
author | Villapún, Victor M. Carter, Luke N. Avery, Steven González-Álvarez, Alba Andrews, James W. Cox, Sophie |
author_facet | Villapún, Victor M. Carter, Luke N. Avery, Steven González-Álvarez, Alba Andrews, James W. Cox, Sophie |
author_sort | Villapún, Victor M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have disrupted many supply chains by making new designs and functionalities possible. The opportunity to realize complex customized structures has led to significant interest within healthcare; however, full utilization critically requires the alignment of the whole supply chain. To offer insights into this process, a survey was conducted to understand the views of different medical AM stakeholders. The results highlighted an agreement between academics, designers, manufacturers, and medical experts, that personalization and design control are the main benefits of AM. Interestingly, surface finish was consistently identified as an obstacle. Nevertheless, there was a degree of acceptance that post-processing was necessary to achieve appropriate quality control. Recommendations were made for extending the use of in situ process monitoring systems to support improved reproducibility. Variations in the future vision of AM were highlighted between stakeholder groups and areas of interest for development noted for each stakeholder. Collectively, this survey indicates that medical stakeholders agree on the capabilities of AM but have different priorities for its implementation and progression. This highlights a degree of disconnection among the supply chain at a ground level; thus, collaboration on AM specific standards and enhancement of communication between stakeholders from project inception is recommended. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9468957 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94689572022-09-13 Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare Villapún, Victor M. Carter, Luke N. Avery, Steven González-Álvarez, Alba Andrews, James W. Cox, Sophie Int J Bioprint Perspective Article Additive manufacturing (AM) technologies have disrupted many supply chains by making new designs and functionalities possible. The opportunity to realize complex customized structures has led to significant interest within healthcare; however, full utilization critically requires the alignment of the whole supply chain. To offer insights into this process, a survey was conducted to understand the views of different medical AM stakeholders. The results highlighted an agreement between academics, designers, manufacturers, and medical experts, that personalization and design control are the main benefits of AM. Interestingly, surface finish was consistently identified as an obstacle. Nevertheless, there was a degree of acceptance that post-processing was necessary to achieve appropriate quality control. Recommendations were made for extending the use of in situ process monitoring systems to support improved reproducibility. Variations in the future vision of AM were highlighted between stakeholder groups and areas of interest for development noted for each stakeholder. Collectively, this survey indicates that medical stakeholders agree on the capabilities of AM but have different priorities for its implementation and progression. This highlights a degree of disconnection among the supply chain at a ground level; thus, collaboration on AM specific standards and enhancement of communication between stakeholders from project inception is recommended. Whioce Publishing Pte. Ltd. 2022-06-29 /pmc/articles/PMC9468957/ /pubmed/36105128 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i3.586 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Villapún, et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0), which permits all non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Perspective Article Villapún, Victor M. Carter, Luke N. Avery, Steven González-Álvarez, Alba Andrews, James W. Cox, Sophie Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title | Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title_full | Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title_fullStr | Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title_full_unstemmed | Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title_short | Stakeholder Perspectives on the Current and Future of Additive Manufacturing in Healthcare |
title_sort | stakeholder perspectives on the current and future of additive manufacturing in healthcare |
topic | Perspective Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9468957/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36105128 http://dx.doi.org/10.18063/ijb.v8i3.586 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT villapunvictorm stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare AT carterluken stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare AT averysteven stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare AT gonzalezalvarezalba stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare AT andrewsjamesw stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare AT coxsophie stakeholderperspectivesonthecurrentandfutureofadditivemanufacturinginhealthcare |