Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomas, Jeswin M., Bhat, Sham S., Amutha Prabha, A. Esai, Harris, Anoop, Rinu, K, Mohan, Amala P
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110678
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21
_version_ 1784788593755029504
author Thomas, Jeswin M.
Bhat, Sham S.
Amutha Prabha, A. Esai
Harris, Anoop
Rinu, K
Mohan, Amala P
author_facet Thomas, Jeswin M.
Bhat, Sham S.
Amutha Prabha, A. Esai
Harris, Anoop
Rinu, K
Mohan, Amala P
author_sort Thomas, Jeswin M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the microleakage of several coronal seal materials in pulpotomized primary molars– in vitro. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-five primary molars were prepared with proximo-occlusal cavities. Restoration was done with Zinc oxide eugenol cement, SSC, composite resin, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration technique with stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to statistically analyze the results. CONCLUSION: With regard to this present study composite resin and resin-modified GIC offers a good alternative for SSC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9469226
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94692262022-09-14 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study Thomas, Jeswin M. Bhat, Sham S. Amutha Prabha, A. Esai Harris, Anoop Rinu, K Mohan, Amala P J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the microleakage of several coronal seal materials in pulpotomized primary molars– in vitro. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-five primary molars were prepared with proximo-occlusal cavities. Restoration was done with Zinc oxide eugenol cement, SSC, composite resin, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration technique with stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to statistically analyze the results. CONCLUSION: With regard to this present study composite resin and resin-modified GIC offers a good alternative for SSC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469226/ /pubmed/36110678 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Thomas, Jeswin M.
Bhat, Sham S.
Amutha Prabha, A. Esai
Harris, Anoop
Rinu, K
Mohan, Amala P
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of microleakage of various restorative materials in pulpotomized primary molars - in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469226/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110678
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasjeswinm comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy
AT bhatshams comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy
AT amuthaprabhaaesai comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy
AT harrisanoop comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy
AT rinuk comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy
AT mohanamalap comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy