Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110678 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21 |
_version_ | 1784788593755029504 |
---|---|
author | Thomas, Jeswin M. Bhat, Sham S. Amutha Prabha, A. Esai Harris, Anoop Rinu, K Mohan, Amala P |
author_facet | Thomas, Jeswin M. Bhat, Sham S. Amutha Prabha, A. Esai Harris, Anoop Rinu, K Mohan, Amala P |
author_sort | Thomas, Jeswin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the microleakage of several coronal seal materials in pulpotomized primary molars– in vitro. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-five primary molars were prepared with proximo-occlusal cavities. Restoration was done with Zinc oxide eugenol cement, SSC, composite resin, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration technique with stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to statistically analyze the results. CONCLUSION: With regard to this present study composite resin and resin-modified GIC offers a good alternative for SSC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469226 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94692262022-09-14 Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study Thomas, Jeswin M. Bhat, Sham S. Amutha Prabha, A. Esai Harris, Anoop Rinu, K Mohan, Amala P J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Conventionally, stainless steel crown (SSC) is the preferred material for the restoration of pulpotomized primary molars. However, in situations where stainless steel cannot be used necessity for other restorative material arises. AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the microleakage of several coronal seal materials in pulpotomized primary molars– in vitro. METHODOLOGY: Seventy-five primary molars were prepared with proximo-occlusal cavities. Restoration was done with Zinc oxide eugenol cement, SSC, composite resin, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (GIC), and amalgam. Microleakage was assessed using dye penetration technique with stereomicroscope and scanning electron microscope. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND RESULTS: The Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney tests were used to statistically analyze the results. CONCLUSION: With regard to this present study composite resin and resin-modified GIC offers a good alternative for SSC. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469226/ /pubmed/36110678 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Thomas, Jeswin M. Bhat, Sham S. Amutha Prabha, A. Esai Harris, Anoop Rinu, K Mohan, Amala P Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Microleakage of Various Restorative Materials in Pulpotomized Primary Molars - In Vitro Study |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of microleakage of various restorative materials in pulpotomized primary molars - in vitro study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469226/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110678 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_553_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT thomasjeswinm comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy AT bhatshams comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy AT amuthaprabhaaesai comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy AT harrisanoop comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy AT rinuk comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy AT mohanamalap comparativeevaluationofmicroleakageofvariousrestorativematerialsinpulpotomizedprimarymolarsinvitrostudy |