Cargando…

Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Advanced Platelet-rich Fibrin and Standard Platelet-rich Fibrin in Mandibular Third Molar Surgery

BACKGROUND: Disimpaction of mandibular of third molar is one of the commonest minor oral surgical procedures. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) plays a vital role in both hard and soft tissue healing. There are various subtypes of PRF used for different surgical sites. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Riaz, Rahim, Radhakrishnan, Mensudar, Perumal, Jayavelu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110692
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_157_22
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Disimpaction of mandibular of third molar is one of the commonest minor oral surgical procedures. Platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) plays a vital role in both hard and soft tissue healing. There are various subtypes of PRF used for different surgical sites. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to compare and evaluate the effectiveness of Advanced PRF (A-PRF) and Standard PRF (S-PRF) in the healing process of the surgical sites after the removal of mandibular third molars. Changes in swelling, pain, and mouth opening were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 patients (3 men, 7 women; 18–35 years old) were selected for the removal of bilateral impacted mandibular third molar teeth. A-PRF and S-PRF were placed in the right-hand side for 5 patients in each group. In both the groups, the left side of the patients was taken as the control group. Postoperative pain was measured using a visual analogue scale (VAS), postoperative swelling was calculated using the distance between multiple facial landmarks (method) and mouth opening measured interincisally on the 1(st) postoperative day, 3(rd) day, and the 7(th) day, respectively. SPSS version 26.0 was used for data analysis. RESULTS: Advanced PRF group recorded noteworthy improvement in pain (P = 0.063), swelling (P = 0.001), and mouth opening (P = 0.013) when compared to the standard PRF group. There was statistically substantial variance between the advanced PRF and standard PRF groups. CONCLUSION: Advanced PRF group showed decreased swelling, pain, and increased mouth opening compared to standard PRF group.