Cargando…
An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis
AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of normal saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, and 0.01% hypochlorous acid against Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antimicrobial activity was assayed by Kirby–Bauer cup-well agar diffusion method. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110823 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_172_22 |
_version_ | 1784788601607815168 |
---|---|
author | Anwar, Saif Sivalingam, Balaji Vijayakumar, Nyklesh Vivek, K Perumal, Lavanya P. K. Prabha, Esai A. |
author_facet | Anwar, Saif Sivalingam, Balaji Vijayakumar, Nyklesh Vivek, K Perumal, Lavanya P. K. Prabha, Esai A. |
author_sort | Anwar, Saif |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of normal saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, and 0.01% hypochlorous acid against Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antimicrobial activity was assayed by Kirby–Bauer cup-well agar diffusion method. Three cup-wells were bored in each petriplate and were filled with 50 μl of each of the respective test agents. Culture plates were placed in an incubator at 37°C and after 24 hours, the size of the magnification inhibition zone was quantified with a caliper and recorded in respective tables. The experiment was reiterated ten times for each reagent, and the diameter of the magnification inhibition zones caused by the irrigation solutions was recorded. The antimicrobial activity of the three test solutions was determined. RESULTS: The antibacterial property of the three groups was compared by utilizing ANOVA test. The association was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.000). The antibacterial property between 2.5% NaOCl and 0.01% HOCl was further compared with independent t test. This association was however not statistically significant (P = 0.02). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469257 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94692572022-09-14 An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis Anwar, Saif Sivalingam, Balaji Vijayakumar, Nyklesh Vivek, K Perumal, Lavanya P. K. Prabha, Esai A. J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article AIM: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate and compare the antimicrobial activity of normal saline, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, and 0.01% hypochlorous acid against Enterococcus faecalis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antimicrobial activity was assayed by Kirby–Bauer cup-well agar diffusion method. Three cup-wells were bored in each petriplate and were filled with 50 μl of each of the respective test agents. Culture plates were placed in an incubator at 37°C and after 24 hours, the size of the magnification inhibition zone was quantified with a caliper and recorded in respective tables. The experiment was reiterated ten times for each reagent, and the diameter of the magnification inhibition zones caused by the irrigation solutions was recorded. The antimicrobial activity of the three test solutions was determined. RESULTS: The antibacterial property of the three groups was compared by utilizing ANOVA test. The association was found to be statistically significant (P = 0.000). The antibacterial property between 2.5% NaOCl and 0.01% HOCl was further compared with independent t test. This association was however not statistically significant (P = 0.02). Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469257/ /pubmed/36110823 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_172_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Anwar, Saif Sivalingam, Balaji Vijayakumar, Nyklesh Vivek, K Perumal, Lavanya P. K. Prabha, Esai A. An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title | An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title_full | An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title_fullStr | An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title_full_unstemmed | An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title_short | An In Vitro Comparison of the Effect of Wound Irrigating Solution (0.01% Hypochlorous Acid) and 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite Against Enterococcus Faecalis |
title_sort | in vitro comparison of the effect of wound irrigating solution (0.01% hypochlorous acid) and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite against enterococcus faecalis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469257/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110823 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_172_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anwarsaif aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT sivalingambalaji aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT vijayakumarnyklesh aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT vivekk aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT perumallavanyapk aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT prabhaesaia aninvitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT anwarsaif invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT sivalingambalaji invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT vijayakumarnyklesh invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT vivekk invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT perumallavanyapk invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT prabhaesaia invitrocomparisonoftheeffectofwoundirrigatingsolution001hypochlorousacidand25sodiumhypochloriteagainstenterococcusfaecalis |