Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups (n = 12) and obturated by lateral condensation te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mueen Ahmed, Syed, Sorte Gawali, Kranti, Paul, Princy, Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed, Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Arwa, Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469298/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110645
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_118_22
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups (n = 12) and obturated by lateral condensation technique. Obturation and root canal sealing was done by either Group I: using GuttaFlow Bioseal, Group II: using Super-Bond RC Sealer and Group III: using Adseal sealer, system. Microleakage was assessed by means of dye penetration method. RESULTS: The dye penetration in Group II was more than in Groups I and III in both vertical and horizontal directions, suggesting that GuttaFlow Bioseal and Adseal sealer are effective in reducing the apical leakage compared to Super-Bond RC Sealer. CONCLUSION: Bioceramic GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealers seal are better root canal sealer but they cannot totally eliminate apical leakage.

Ejemplares similares