Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups (n = 12) and obturated by lateral condensation te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_118_22 |
_version_ | 1784788612109303808 |
---|---|
author | Mueen Ahmed, Syed Sorte Gawali, Kranti Paul, Princy Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Arwa Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed |
author_facet | Mueen Ahmed, Syed Sorte Gawali, Kranti Paul, Princy Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Arwa Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed |
author_sort | Mueen Ahmed, Syed |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups (n = 12) and obturated by lateral condensation technique. Obturation and root canal sealing was done by either Group I: using GuttaFlow Bioseal, Group II: using Super-Bond RC Sealer and Group III: using Adseal sealer, system. Microleakage was assessed by means of dye penetration method. RESULTS: The dye penetration in Group II was more than in Groups I and III in both vertical and horizontal directions, suggesting that GuttaFlow Bioseal and Adseal sealer are effective in reducing the apical leakage compared to Super-Bond RC Sealer. CONCLUSION: Bioceramic GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealers seal are better root canal sealer but they cannot totally eliminate apical leakage. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469298 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94692982022-09-14 Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer Mueen Ahmed, Syed Sorte Gawali, Kranti Paul, Princy Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Arwa Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study is to evaluate apical sealing ability of GuttaFlow Bioseal, Super-Bond RC Sealer, and Adseal root canal sealer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 36 extracted human single rooted permanent teeth, divided into three groups (n = 12) and obturated by lateral condensation technique. Obturation and root canal sealing was done by either Group I: using GuttaFlow Bioseal, Group II: using Super-Bond RC Sealer and Group III: using Adseal sealer, system. Microleakage was assessed by means of dye penetration method. RESULTS: The dye penetration in Group II was more than in Groups I and III in both vertical and horizontal directions, suggesting that GuttaFlow Bioseal and Adseal sealer are effective in reducing the apical leakage compared to Super-Bond RC Sealer. CONCLUSION: Bioceramic GuttaFlow Bioseal root canal sealers seal are better root canal sealer but they cannot totally eliminate apical leakage. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469298/ /pubmed/36110645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_118_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mueen Ahmed, Syed Sorte Gawali, Kranti Paul, Princy Ismail, Prabu Mahin Syed Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Arwa Abdullah Alkhelaiwi, Mohammed Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Apical Sealing Efficacy of Guttaflow Bioseal, Super-Bond Rc Sealer and Adseal Root Canal Sealer |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of apical sealing efficacy of guttaflow bioseal, super-bond rc sealer and adseal root canal sealer |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469298/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110645 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_118_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mueenahmedsyed comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer AT sortegawalikranti comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer AT paulprincy comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer AT ismailprabumahinsyed comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer AT abdullahalkhelaiwiarwa comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer AT abdullahalkhelaiwimohammed comparativeevaluationofapicalsealingefficacyofguttaflowbiosealsuperbondrcsealerandadsealrootcanalsealer |