Cargando…

Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study

BACKGROUND: Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) is an approach that uses a constant and slow flow of delivering the anesthetic solution into the tissues, which is capable of alleviating pain and discomfort in children. AIM: Assessment of perceived pain in children during palatal an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Patil, Anand N., Saurabh, Sandeep, Pragya, Prakhar, Aijazuddin, Amreen, Chandra, Satish, Singh Chawla, Jatinder Pal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110584
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_71_22
_version_ 1784788615612596224
author Patil, Anand N.
Saurabh, Sandeep
Pragya, Prakhar
Aijazuddin, Amreen
Chandra, Satish
Singh Chawla, Jatinder Pal
author_facet Patil, Anand N.
Saurabh, Sandeep
Pragya, Prakhar
Aijazuddin, Amreen
Chandra, Satish
Singh Chawla, Jatinder Pal
author_sort Patil, Anand N.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) is an approach that uses a constant and slow flow of delivering the anesthetic solution into the tissues, which is capable of alleviating pain and discomfort in children. AIM: Assessment of perceived pain in children during palatal anesthesia using Wand technique and conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 children requiring bilateral palatal anesthesia were included in the study in a split-half design. The children were asked to indicate their intensity of pain response on a visual analog scale (VAS) after administration of anesthesia by the Wand technique and the conventional technique. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0. Mann–Whitney U test compared the mean VAS scores between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: The mean VAS scores using the Wand technique and the conventional technique were 3.87 ± 1.99 and 4.20 ± 1.44, respectively (P = 0.332). Females had lesser VAS scores compared to males (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Females readily accepted the Wand technique compared to males, although there was no substantial difference between the two injection procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9469312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94693122022-09-14 Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study Patil, Anand N. Saurabh, Sandeep Pragya, Prakhar Aijazuddin, Amreen Chandra, Satish Singh Chawla, Jatinder Pal J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Computer-controlled local anesthetic delivery (CCLAD) is an approach that uses a constant and slow flow of delivering the anesthetic solution into the tissues, which is capable of alleviating pain and discomfort in children. AIM: Assessment of perceived pain in children during palatal anesthesia using Wand technique and conventional technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 30 children requiring bilateral palatal anesthesia were included in the study in a split-half design. The children were asked to indicate their intensity of pain response on a visual analog scale (VAS) after administration of anesthesia by the Wand technique and the conventional technique. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) 16.0. Mann–Whitney U test compared the mean VAS scores between the two groups. Statistical significance was defined as a P value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: The mean VAS scores using the Wand technique and the conventional technique were 3.87 ± 1.99 and 4.20 ± 1.44, respectively (P = 0.332). Females had lesser VAS scores compared to males (P = 0.008). CONCLUSION: Females readily accepted the Wand technique compared to males, although there was no substantial difference between the two injection procedures. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469312/ /pubmed/36110584 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_71_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Patil, Anand N.
Saurabh, Sandeep
Pragya, Prakhar
Aijazuddin, Amreen
Chandra, Satish
Singh Chawla, Jatinder Pal
Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title_full Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title_fullStr Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title_short Comparative Assessment of Perceived Pain in Children During Palatal Anesthesia Using Two Injection Techniques: An In Vivo Study
title_sort comparative assessment of perceived pain in children during palatal anesthesia using two injection techniques: an in vivo study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110584
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_71_22
work_keys_str_mv AT patilanandn comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy
AT saurabhsandeep comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy
AT pragyaprakhar comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy
AT aijazuddinamreen comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy
AT chandrasatish comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy
AT singhchawlajatinderpal comparativeassessmentofperceivedpaininchildrenduringpalatalanesthesiausingtwoinjectiontechniquesaninvivostudy