Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare two different implant designs having different neck configuration and neck interfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups, each containing 25 subjects. In Group I, conical connection (CC) (Nobel Biocare) with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mangalvedhekar, Madhura, Manas, Abhigyan, Jyothirmayee, K, Richashree, Tenglikar, Pavan, Das, Abhaya Chandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_806_21
_version_ 1784788616812167168
author Mangalvedhekar, Madhura
Manas, Abhigyan
Jyothirmayee, K
Richashree,
Tenglikar, Pavan
Das, Abhaya Chandra
author_facet Mangalvedhekar, Madhura
Manas, Abhigyan
Jyothirmayee, K
Richashree,
Tenglikar, Pavan
Das, Abhaya Chandra
author_sort Mangalvedhekar, Madhura
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare two different implant designs having different neck configuration and neck interfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups, each containing 25 subjects. In Group I, conical connection (CC) (Nobel Biocare) with back-tapered collar dental implant and in Group II, external-hexagon (EH) (Nobel Biocare) with flat-to-flat implant-abutment interface dental implant was used. Radiographic marginal bone crest level and marginal bone loss (MBL) were compared. RESULTS: A significant less MBL was seen in Group I compared to Group II recorded at different intervals of time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CC implants with back-tapered collar exhibited less MBL as compared to EH implants with flat-to-flat implant-abutment interface.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9469317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94693172022-09-14 Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial Mangalvedhekar, Madhura Manas, Abhigyan Jyothirmayee, K Richashree, Tenglikar, Pavan Das, Abhaya Chandra J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study is to compare two different implant designs having different neck configuration and neck interfaces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty subjects were randomly divided into 2 groups, each containing 25 subjects. In Group I, conical connection (CC) (Nobel Biocare) with back-tapered collar dental implant and in Group II, external-hexagon (EH) (Nobel Biocare) with flat-to-flat implant-abutment interface dental implant was used. Radiographic marginal bone crest level and marginal bone loss (MBL) were compared. RESULTS: A significant less MBL was seen in Group I compared to Group II recorded at different intervals of time (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: CC implants with back-tapered collar exhibited less MBL as compared to EH implants with flat-to-flat implant-abutment interface. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469317/ /pubmed/36110753 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_806_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mangalvedhekar, Madhura
Manas, Abhigyan
Jyothirmayee, K
Richashree,
Tenglikar, Pavan
Das, Abhaya Chandra
Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title_full Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title_short Assessment of Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Implant with Two Different Connections Con iguration: A Controlled Trial
title_sort assessment of clinical and radiological outcome of implant with two different connections con iguration: a controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110753
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_806_21
work_keys_str_mv AT mangalvedhekarmadhura assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial
AT manasabhigyan assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial
AT jyothirmayeek assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial
AT richashree assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial
AT tenglikarpavan assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial
AT dasabhayachandra assessmentofclinicalandradiologicaloutcomeofimplantwithtwodifferentconnectionsconigurationacontrolledtrial

Ejemplares similares