Cargando…
A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aeroso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110685 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21 |
_version_ | 1784788631026663424 |
---|---|
author | Arun, Lily Soumya, S. V. Altaf, Syed Khalid Shankar, S. Murali, Kruthika Panwar, Vasim Raja |
author_facet | Arun, Lily Soumya, S. V. Altaf, Syed Khalid Shankar, S. Murali, Kruthika Panwar, Vasim Raja |
author_sort | Arun, Lily |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aerosol generated between modified and conventional technique (CT) of bracket bonding. METHODS: This study includes 40 patients who required complete orthodontic treatment. In all 40 patients, one of the arches was bonded with modified technique (MT) and the opposing with CT. The time taken to prepare tooth in both the techniques were accessed. The efficiency of bond was seen over a period of 6 months. The amount of aerosol particulate matter generated during CT and MT was observed using a laser air quality monitor CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the bond failure and time taken between both the techniques. The aerosol generated in MT was minimal or almost negligible when compared to the use of CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94693752022-09-14 A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” Arun, Lily Soumya, S. V. Altaf, Syed Khalid Shankar, S. Murali, Kruthika Panwar, Vasim Raja J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aerosol generated between modified and conventional technique (CT) of bracket bonding. METHODS: This study includes 40 patients who required complete orthodontic treatment. In all 40 patients, one of the arches was bonded with modified technique (MT) and the opposing with CT. The time taken to prepare tooth in both the techniques were accessed. The efficiency of bond was seen over a period of 6 months. The amount of aerosol particulate matter generated during CT and MT was observed using a laser air quality monitor CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the bond failure and time taken between both the techniques. The aerosol generated in MT was minimal or almost negligible when compared to the use of CT. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469375/ /pubmed/36110685 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Arun, Lily Soumya, S. V. Altaf, Syed Khalid Shankar, S. Murali, Kruthika Panwar, Vasim Raja A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title | A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title_full | A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title_fullStr | A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title_short | A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” |
title_sort | comparison on efficiency and aerosol generation between “modified and conventional technique of bracket bonding” |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110685 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT arunlily acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT soumyasv acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT altafsyedkhalid acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT shankars acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT muralikruthika acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT panwarvasimraja acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT arunlily comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT soumyasv comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT altafsyedkhalid comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT shankars comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT muralikruthika comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding AT panwarvasimraja comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding |