Cargando…

A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”

INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aeroso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arun, Lily, Soumya, S. V., Altaf, Syed Khalid, Shankar, S., Murali, Kruthika, Panwar, Vasim Raja
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110685
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21
_version_ 1784788631026663424
author Arun, Lily
Soumya, S. V.
Altaf, Syed Khalid
Shankar, S.
Murali, Kruthika
Panwar, Vasim Raja
author_facet Arun, Lily
Soumya, S. V.
Altaf, Syed Khalid
Shankar, S.
Murali, Kruthika
Panwar, Vasim Raja
author_sort Arun, Lily
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aerosol generated between modified and conventional technique (CT) of bracket bonding. METHODS: This study includes 40 patients who required complete orthodontic treatment. In all 40 patients, one of the arches was bonded with modified technique (MT) and the opposing with CT. The time taken to prepare tooth in both the techniques were accessed. The efficiency of bond was seen over a period of 6 months. The amount of aerosol particulate matter generated during CT and MT was observed using a laser air quality monitor CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the bond failure and time taken between both the techniques. The aerosol generated in MT was minimal or almost negligible when compared to the use of CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9469375
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94693752022-09-14 A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding” Arun, Lily Soumya, S. V. Altaf, Syed Khalid Shankar, S. Murali, Kruthika Panwar, Vasim Raja J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The novel COVID-19 which spread's primarily through oral and nasal passage poses a major threat of spread during dental treatments. It is important for dental practitioners to use minimal aerosol techniques. The aim of this study is to compare the time taken, efficiency and aerosol generated between modified and conventional technique (CT) of bracket bonding. METHODS: This study includes 40 patients who required complete orthodontic treatment. In all 40 patients, one of the arches was bonded with modified technique (MT) and the opposing with CT. The time taken to prepare tooth in both the techniques were accessed. The efficiency of bond was seen over a period of 6 months. The amount of aerosol particulate matter generated during CT and MT was observed using a laser air quality monitor CONCLUSION: There is no significant difference in the bond failure and time taken between both the techniques. The aerosol generated in MT was minimal or almost negligible when compared to the use of CT. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469375/ /pubmed/36110685 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Arun, Lily
Soumya, S. V.
Altaf, Syed Khalid
Shankar, S.
Murali, Kruthika
Panwar, Vasim Raja
A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title_full A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title_fullStr A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title_full_unstemmed A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title_short A Comparison on Efficiency and Aerosol Generation between “Modified and Conventional Technique of Bracket Bonding”
title_sort comparison on efficiency and aerosol generation between “modified and conventional technique of bracket bonding”
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469375/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110685
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_868_21
work_keys_str_mv AT arunlily acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT soumyasv acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT altafsyedkhalid acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT shankars acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT muralikruthika acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT panwarvasimraja acomparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT arunlily comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT soumyasv comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT altafsyedkhalid comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT shankars comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT muralikruthika comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding
AT panwarvasimraja comparisononefficiencyandaerosolgenerationbetweenmodifiedandconventionaltechniqueofbracketbonding