A Comparison of Xenograft Graft Material and Synthetic Bioactive Glass Allograft in Immediate Dental Implant Patients

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to compare xenograft graft material and synthetic bioactive glass allograft in immediate dental implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were grouped as Group A patients (xenograft graft material, BioOss) and Group B (synthetic allograft mater...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goutam, Manish, Batra, Namish, Jyothirmayee, K, Bagrecha, Nitin, Deshmukh, Poonam, Malik, Sakshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Original Article
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110740
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_808_21
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study is to compare xenograft graft material and synthetic bioactive glass allograft in immediate dental implant patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients were grouped as Group A patients (xenograft graft material, BioOss) and Group B (synthetic allograft material, Perio Glas) and immediate implant placement was done. Plaque index, gingival index, probing depth, and bone resorption were compared at different intervals. RESULTS: A nonsignificant difference was observed in all parameters at different interval of time (P > 0.05) recorded at mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual side. CONCLUSION: Xenograft (Bio Oss) and synthetic allograft (PerioGlas) found to be effective graft materials treatment choice.

Ejemplares similares