Cargando…
A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study
INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after the maxillectomy is challenging to the clinician and the patient. Since the invention of the implants, the rehabilitation has changed the treatment strategies. Hence in our study, we evaluated the maxillary obturator that is implant supported. MATERIALS AND METHODS...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_777_21 |
_version_ | 1784788651084873728 |
---|---|
author | Mandal, Nag Bhushan Kumari, Akanksha Baldev, Karan Cecil Shobana, T. Warghane, Komal Khond Doddy, Lokanathan Balaji Peela, Parvathi Ramya |
author_facet | Mandal, Nag Bhushan Kumari, Akanksha Baldev, Karan Cecil Shobana, T. Warghane, Komal Khond Doddy, Lokanathan Balaji Peela, Parvathi Ramya |
author_sort | Mandal, Nag Bhushan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after the maxillectomy is challenging to the clinician and the patient. Since the invention of the implants, the rehabilitation has changed the treatment strategies. Hence in our study, we evaluated the maxillary obturator that is implant supported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We piloted a retrospective analysis of the patients who received the maxillary obturator prosthesis with implant support from the department records from 2010 to 2020. We finalized 50 subjects who fit the criteria and evaluated clinically for various parameters. The comparison of these parameters was done using the Chi-square tests deliberating P < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: We observed that the implant survival was 94%. There was significant variation for the implant bone height (P = 0.001) and the implant threads exposed (P = 0.044) for the posterior and the anterior regions. CONCLUSION: The implant-supported maxillary obturator prosthesis has been shown to perform clinically satisfactorily. The success of the implant-supported maxillary obturator is dependent on the time of the placement, load applied, the radiation regime, and the patient follow-up. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469456 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94694562022-09-14 A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study Mandal, Nag Bhushan Kumari, Akanksha Baldev, Karan Cecil Shobana, T. Warghane, Komal Khond Doddy, Lokanathan Balaji Peela, Parvathi Ramya J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Rehabilitation after the maxillectomy is challenging to the clinician and the patient. Since the invention of the implants, the rehabilitation has changed the treatment strategies. Hence in our study, we evaluated the maxillary obturator that is implant supported. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We piloted a retrospective analysis of the patients who received the maxillary obturator prosthesis with implant support from the department records from 2010 to 2020. We finalized 50 subjects who fit the criteria and evaluated clinically for various parameters. The comparison of these parameters was done using the Chi-square tests deliberating P < 0.05 as significant. RESULTS: We observed that the implant survival was 94%. There was significant variation for the implant bone height (P = 0.001) and the implant threads exposed (P = 0.044) for the posterior and the anterior regions. CONCLUSION: The implant-supported maxillary obturator prosthesis has been shown to perform clinically satisfactorily. The success of the implant-supported maxillary obturator is dependent on the time of the placement, load applied, the radiation regime, and the patient follow-up. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469456/ /pubmed/36110761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_777_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mandal, Nag Bhushan Kumari, Akanksha Baldev, Karan Cecil Shobana, T. Warghane, Komal Khond Doddy, Lokanathan Balaji Peela, Parvathi Ramya A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title | A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title_full | A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title_fullStr | A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title_short | A Clinical Evaluation of Implant-Supported Maxillary Obturator Prostheses: An Original Study |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of implant-supported maxillary obturator prostheses: an original study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469456/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110761 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_777_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mandalnagbhushan aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT kumariakanksha aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT baldevkarancecil aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT shobanat aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT warghanekomalkhond aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT doddylokanathanbalaji aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT peelaparvathiramya aclinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT mandalnagbhushan clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT kumariakanksha clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT baldevkarancecil clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT shobanat clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT warghanekomalkhond clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT doddylokanathanbalaji clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy AT peelaparvathiramya clinicalevaluationofimplantsupportedmaxillaryobturatorprosthesesanoriginalstudy |