Cargando…
Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses
BACKGROUND: Zirconia and other dental pottery, heat-restored polymethyl methacrylate, titanium and other metal amalgams, or a mix of these materials are utilized to fix inserts. It is important to choose a material that is resistant to bacterial colonization for implant-supported prostheses, but dur...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22 |
_version_ | 1784788652342116352 |
---|---|
author | Pawar, Ranjit Omprakash Narote, Priyanka Sadashivrao Gawai, Kailas Tukaram Amte, Manjiri Prakash Singh, Sandeep Sonkesriya, Subhash |
author_facet | Pawar, Ranjit Omprakash Narote, Priyanka Sadashivrao Gawai, Kailas Tukaram Amte, Manjiri Prakash Singh, Sandeep Sonkesriya, Subhash |
author_sort | Pawar, Ranjit Omprakash |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Zirconia and other dental pottery, heat-restored polymethyl methacrylate, titanium and other metal amalgams, or a mix of these materials are utilized to fix inserts. It is important to choose a material that is resistant to bacterial colonization for implant-supported prostheses, but durability and aesthetics are important factors as well. AIM: Biofilm generation on materials used in implant-supported dental prosthesis manufacturing was an objective of this investigation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 90 discs were prepared. These discs were divided into three groups: group PMMA, group Y-TZP, and group CP-Ti. Each group consisted of 30 discs. As helpful materials, 30 discs (D = 15 mm, H = 3 mm) each were created from either monetarily unadulterated titanium (CP-Ti), yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (YTZP), or hotness-restored polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). The examples were cleaned as per acknowledged practices. The non-contact profilometer (NPFLEX, Bruker, UK) was utilized to survey the surface rougness of each disc, and the outcomes were accounted for as Ra (m). An assortment of gram-negative microbes, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Tannerella albicans, were refined close by cleaned discs produced using heat-relieved PMMA, Y-TZP, or CP-Ti to see which type of biofilm is shaped best. CFU/mL was the unit of estimation (state framing units per milliliter). RESULTS: Y-TZP discs have a substantially higher Ra (349 41 m) than PMMA and CP-Ti discs. Some bacteria that have been associated with peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis may be less prevalent on Y-TZP or CP-Ti discs. Biofilm development must be considered while making implant-supported prostheses using Y-TZP and CP-Ti. CONCLUSION: Y-TZP and CP-Ti are preferred materials for implant-supported prosthesis production because of biofilm development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469461 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94694612022-09-14 Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses Pawar, Ranjit Omprakash Narote, Priyanka Sadashivrao Gawai, Kailas Tukaram Amte, Manjiri Prakash Singh, Sandeep Sonkesriya, Subhash J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Zirconia and other dental pottery, heat-restored polymethyl methacrylate, titanium and other metal amalgams, or a mix of these materials are utilized to fix inserts. It is important to choose a material that is resistant to bacterial colonization for implant-supported prostheses, but durability and aesthetics are important factors as well. AIM: Biofilm generation on materials used in implant-supported dental prosthesis manufacturing was an objective of this investigation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this study, 90 discs were prepared. These discs were divided into three groups: group PMMA, group Y-TZP, and group CP-Ti. Each group consisted of 30 discs. As helpful materials, 30 discs (D = 15 mm, H = 3 mm) each were created from either monetarily unadulterated titanium (CP-Ti), yttria tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (YTZP), or hotness-restored polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA). The examples were cleaned as per acknowledged practices. The non-contact profilometer (NPFLEX, Bruker, UK) was utilized to survey the surface rougness of each disc, and the outcomes were accounted for as Ra (m). An assortment of gram-negative microbes, including Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Tannerella forsythia, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Tannerella albicans, were refined close by cleaned discs produced using heat-relieved PMMA, Y-TZP, or CP-Ti to see which type of biofilm is shaped best. CFU/mL was the unit of estimation (state framing units per milliliter). RESULTS: Y-TZP discs have a substantially higher Ra (349 41 m) than PMMA and CP-Ti discs. Some bacteria that have been associated with peri-mucositis and peri-implantitis may be less prevalent on Y-TZP or CP-Ti discs. Biofilm development must be considered while making implant-supported prostheses using Y-TZP and CP-Ti. CONCLUSION: Y-TZP and CP-Ti are preferred materials for implant-supported prosthesis production because of biofilm development. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469461/ /pubmed/36110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Pawar, Ranjit Omprakash Narote, Priyanka Sadashivrao Gawai, Kailas Tukaram Amte, Manjiri Prakash Singh, Sandeep Sonkesriya, Subhash Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title | Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title_full | Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title_short | Comparative Analysis of Biofilm Formation on Materials Used for the Fabrication of Implant Supported Prostheses |
title_sort | comparative analysis of biofilm formation on materials used for the fabrication of implant supported prostheses |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469461/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110822 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_7_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pawarranjitomprakash comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses AT narotepriyankasadashivrao comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses AT gawaikailastukaram comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses AT amtemanjiriprakash comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses AT singhsandeep comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses AT sonkesriyasubhash comparativeanalysisofbiofilmformationonmaterialsusedforthefabricationofimplantsupportedprostheses |