Cargando…
An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficul...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21 |
_version_ | 1784788653094993920 |
---|---|
author | Nagappan, Nagappan Ejaj, M. Mohamed D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar Tajuddin, Rameezuddin Subbiah, Krithika |
author_facet | Nagappan, Nagappan Ejaj, M. Mohamed D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar Tajuddin, Rameezuddin Subbiah, Krithika |
author_sort | Nagappan, Nagappan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. AIM: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. METHODOLOGY: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. RESULTS: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. CONCLUSION: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469464 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94694642022-09-14 An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis Nagappan, Nagappan Ejaj, M. Mohamed D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar Tajuddin, Rameezuddin Subbiah, Krithika J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. AIM: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. METHODOLOGY: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. RESULTS: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. CONCLUSION: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469464/ /pubmed/36110664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Nagappan, Nagappan Ejaj, M. Mohamed D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar Tajuddin, Rameezuddin Subbiah, Krithika An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title | An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_full | An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_fullStr | An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_full_unstemmed | An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_short | An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis |
title_sort | in vitro study to determine the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthrinses against enterococcus faecalis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469464/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nagappannagappan aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT ejajmmohamed aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT dcruzthomsonmariadasan aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT subbiahgireeshkumar aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT tajuddinrameezuddin aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT subbiahkrithika aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT nagappannagappan invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT ejajmmohamed invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT dcruzthomsonmariadasan invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT subbiahgireeshkumar invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT tajuddinrameezuddin invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis AT subbiahkrithika invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis |