Cargando…

An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis

BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagappan, Nagappan, Ejaj, M. Mohamed, D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan, Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar, Tajuddin, Rameezuddin, Subbiah, Krithika
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21
_version_ 1784788653094993920
author Nagappan, Nagappan
Ejaj, M. Mohamed
D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan
Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar
Tajuddin, Rameezuddin
Subbiah, Krithika
author_facet Nagappan, Nagappan
Ejaj, M. Mohamed
D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan
Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar
Tajuddin, Rameezuddin
Subbiah, Krithika
author_sort Nagappan, Nagappan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. AIM: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. METHODOLOGY: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. RESULTS: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. CONCLUSION: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9469464
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94694642022-09-14 An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis Nagappan, Nagappan Ejaj, M. Mohamed D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar Tajuddin, Rameezuddin Subbiah, Krithika J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: Oral diseases have a strong history of treating by natural remedies. Chemical plaque reduction techniques, including dental mouthwashes, are intriguing because they can help patients who are unable to maintain appropriate mechanical plaque management. They are a less technically difficult alternative to mechanical control. AIM: This study aimed to compare the antibacterial efficacy of an herbal and 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthrinse against Enterococcus faecalis. METHODOLOGY: The antimicrobial effectiveness (zone of inhibition) of an herbal mouthrinse and chlorhexidine mouthrinse was determined by agar well diffusion method. RESULTS: The zone of inhibition for control mouthrinse was 19 mm, and there was no zone of inhibition observed for the experimental mouthrinse. CONCLUSION: The result of this investigation suggests 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate has a better antimicrobial activity than herbal mouthrinse. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2022-07 2022-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9469464/ /pubmed/36110664 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21 Text en Copyright: © 2022 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Nagappan, Nagappan
Ejaj, M. Mohamed
D'cruz, Thomson Mariadasan
Subbiah, Gireesh Kumar
Tajuddin, Rameezuddin
Subbiah, Krithika
An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title_full An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title_fullStr An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title_full_unstemmed An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title_short An In vitro Study to Determine the Antibacterial Activity of Chlorhexidine and Herbal Mouthrinses against Enterococcus faecalis
title_sort in vitro study to determine the antibacterial activity of chlorhexidine and herbal mouthrinses against enterococcus faecalis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469464/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110664
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_819_21
work_keys_str_mv AT nagappannagappan aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT ejajmmohamed aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT dcruzthomsonmariadasan aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT subbiahgireeshkumar aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT tajuddinrameezuddin aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT subbiahkrithika aninvitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT nagappannagappan invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT ejajmmohamed invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT dcruzthomsonmariadasan invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT subbiahgireeshkumar invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT tajuddinrameezuddin invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis
AT subbiahkrithika invitrostudytodeterminetheantibacterialactivityofchlorhexidineandherbalmouthrinsesagainstenterococcusfaecalis