Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review
INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can impose a high financial burden. Several studies have explored the cost-effectiveness of this expensive agent. We conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the quality...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.815587 |
_version_ | 1784788687314223104 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Jiaxu Tan, Jing Tian, Panwen Li, Weimin |
author_facet | Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Jiaxu Tan, Jing Tian, Panwen Li, Weimin |
author_sort | Zhang, Chuan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can impose a high financial burden. Several studies have explored the cost-effectiveness of this expensive agent. We conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the quality of the existing pharmacoeconomic studies on pembrolizumab strategies for NSCLC treatment as well as to conclude the cost-effectiveness of such strategies. METHODS: English and Chinese databases were searched to collect health economic studies on pembrolizumab therapies (monotherapy or a combination with chemotherapy) compared with chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC patients. The reporting quality, modeling methods, and results of incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the included literature were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies, 3 in Chinese and 21 in English, were selected. All reports satisfy a median of 31 out of 40 reporting quality assessment items based on a quality checklist for pharmacoeconomic evaluations. 12 studies used the Markov model and 11 used the partitioned survival model. A common problem identified in the modeling methods was the insufficient justification of the choices of model structure and data inputs. Pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective in the United States and Switzerland, but not in China, France, the UK, or Singapore. CONCLUSION: The current cost-effectiveness studies on pembrolizumab for the treatment of NSCLC are of moderate quality, and the relevant decision-analytic modeling methods have much scope for improvement. The cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab strategies for NSCLC varies across countries, warranting the need to pay more attention to the methodologies of pharmacoeconomic research in order to produce correct outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness for different countries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021250480 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9469648 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94696482022-09-14 Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Jiaxu Tan, Jing Tian, Panwen Li, Weimin Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: Pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can impose a high financial burden. Several studies have explored the cost-effectiveness of this expensive agent. We conducted a systematic review and pooled analysis to evaluate the quality of the existing pharmacoeconomic studies on pembrolizumab strategies for NSCLC treatment as well as to conclude the cost-effectiveness of such strategies. METHODS: English and Chinese databases were searched to collect health economic studies on pembrolizumab therapies (monotherapy or a combination with chemotherapy) compared with chemotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC patients. The reporting quality, modeling methods, and results of incremental cost-effectiveness analysis of the included literature were descriptively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 24 studies, 3 in Chinese and 21 in English, were selected. All reports satisfy a median of 31 out of 40 reporting quality assessment items based on a quality checklist for pharmacoeconomic evaluations. 12 studies used the Markov model and 11 used the partitioned survival model. A common problem identified in the modeling methods was the insufficient justification of the choices of model structure and data inputs. Pembrolizumab was found to be cost-effective in the United States and Switzerland, but not in China, France, the UK, or Singapore. CONCLUSION: The current cost-effectiveness studies on pembrolizumab for the treatment of NSCLC are of moderate quality, and the relevant decision-analytic modeling methods have much scope for improvement. The cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab strategies for NSCLC varies across countries, warranting the need to pay more attention to the methodologies of pharmacoeconomic research in order to produce correct outcomes in terms of cost-effectiveness for different countries. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42021250480 Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9469648/ /pubmed/36110966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.815587 Text en Copyright © 2022 Zhang, Zhang, Tan, Tian and Li https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Zhang, Chuan Zhang, Jiaxu Tan, Jing Tian, Panwen Li, Weimin Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title | Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness of Pembrolizumab for the treatment of Non–Small-Cell lung cancer: A systematic review |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for the treatment of non–small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9469648/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110966 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.815587 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangchuan costeffectivenessofpembrolizumabforthetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview AT zhangjiaxu costeffectivenessofpembrolizumabforthetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview AT tanjing costeffectivenessofpembrolizumabforthetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview AT tianpanwen costeffectivenessofpembrolizumabforthetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview AT liweimin costeffectivenessofpembrolizumabforthetreatmentofnonsmallcelllungcancerasystematicreview |