Cargando…

The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus

The Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test, a test purported to assess oculomotor skills, does not detect eye movement disorder in nystagmus syndromes. The test should not be used for the clinical evaluation of oculomotor disorders. PURPOSE: The DEM test ratio compares a horizontal number naming subt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tanke, Nouk, Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D., Goossens, Jeroen, Boonstra, F. Nienke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001930
_version_ 1784788765564207104
author Tanke, Nouk
Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Goossens, Jeroen
Boonstra, F. Nienke
author_facet Tanke, Nouk
Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Goossens, Jeroen
Boonstra, F. Nienke
author_sort Tanke, Nouk
collection PubMed
description The Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test, a test purported to assess oculomotor skills, does not detect eye movement disorder in nystagmus syndromes. The test should not be used for the clinical evaluation of oculomotor disorders. PURPOSE: The DEM test ratio compares a horizontal number naming subtest with a vertical one to identify oculomotor problems independent of a child's visual-verbal naming skills. Here, we tested the construct validity of this method by comparing scores of children with and without pathologic nystagmus. Such a nystagmus disturbs normal fixation and saccadic behavior because of the presence of involuntary rhythmic oscillations of the eyes. Therefore, if the ratio is indeed a comprehensive measure of oculomotor problems, children with nystagmus should show an increased ratio score. METHODS: The DEM test performances of normally sighted children (n = 94), children with ocular visual impairments (VI(o); n = 33), and children with cerebral visual impairment (n = 30) were analyzed using linear regression. Part of the children with VI(o) and cerebral visual impairment had either fusion maldevelopment nystagmus syndrome (n = 8) or infantile nystagmus syndrome (n = 20), whereas the others showed no pathologic nystagmus. RESULTS: The times needed for the horizontal and vertical subtests were significantly different between children with normal vision, VI(o), and cerebral visual impairment (P < .001). However, the presence of nystagmus did not add significantly to the horizontal and vertical times (P > .20), nor did it have an effect on the ratio (P > .10). CONCLUSIONS: The DEM test ratio is not sensitive to fixation and saccade abnormalities associated with nystagmus, indicating that it does not have general construct validity to detect true eye movement disorders. Although not suitable for the evaluation of oculomotor disorders, the subtests do have clinical relevance in the diagnosis of cerebral visual impairment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9470044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94700442022-09-21 The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus Tanke, Nouk Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D. Goossens, Jeroen Boonstra, F. Nienke Optom Vis Sci Original Investigations The Developmental Eye Movement (DEM) test, a test purported to assess oculomotor skills, does not detect eye movement disorder in nystagmus syndromes. The test should not be used for the clinical evaluation of oculomotor disorders. PURPOSE: The DEM test ratio compares a horizontal number naming subtest with a vertical one to identify oculomotor problems independent of a child's visual-verbal naming skills. Here, we tested the construct validity of this method by comparing scores of children with and without pathologic nystagmus. Such a nystagmus disturbs normal fixation and saccadic behavior because of the presence of involuntary rhythmic oscillations of the eyes. Therefore, if the ratio is indeed a comprehensive measure of oculomotor problems, children with nystagmus should show an increased ratio score. METHODS: The DEM test performances of normally sighted children (n = 94), children with ocular visual impairments (VI(o); n = 33), and children with cerebral visual impairment (n = 30) were analyzed using linear regression. Part of the children with VI(o) and cerebral visual impairment had either fusion maldevelopment nystagmus syndrome (n = 8) or infantile nystagmus syndrome (n = 20), whereas the others showed no pathologic nystagmus. RESULTS: The times needed for the horizontal and vertical subtests were significantly different between children with normal vision, VI(o), and cerebral visual impairment (P < .001). However, the presence of nystagmus did not add significantly to the horizontal and vertical times (P > .20), nor did it have an effect on the ratio (P > .10). CONCLUSIONS: The DEM test ratio is not sensitive to fixation and saccade abnormalities associated with nystagmus, indicating that it does not have general construct validity to detect true eye movement disorders. Although not suitable for the evaluation of oculomotor disorders, the subtests do have clinical relevance in the diagnosis of cerebral visual impairment. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09 2022-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9470044/ /pubmed/35914094 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001930 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Optometry. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Investigations
Tanke, Nouk
Barsingerhorn, Annemiek D.
Goossens, Jeroen
Boonstra, F. Nienke
The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title_full The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title_fullStr The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title_full_unstemmed The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title_short The Developmental Eye Movement Test Does Not Detect Oculomotor Problems: Evidence from Children with Nystagmus
title_sort developmental eye movement test does not detect oculomotor problems: evidence from children with nystagmus
topic Original Investigations
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35914094
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/OPX.0000000000001930
work_keys_str_mv AT tankenouk thedevelopmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT barsingerhornannemiekd thedevelopmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT goossensjeroen thedevelopmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT boonstrafnienke thedevelopmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT tankenouk developmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT barsingerhornannemiekd developmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT goossensjeroen developmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus
AT boonstrafnienke developmentaleyemovementtestdoesnotdetectoculomotorproblemsevidencefromchildrenwithnystagmus