Cargando…
Does peer review improve the statistical content of manuscripts? A study on 27 467 submissions to four journals
Improving the methodological rigour and the quality of data analysis in manuscripts submitted to journals is key to ensure the validity of scientific claims. However, there is scant knowledge of how manuscripts change throughout the review process in academic journals. Here, we examined 27 467 manus...
Autores principales: | Garcia-Costa, Daniel, Forte, Anabel, Lòpez-Iñesta, Emilia, Squazzoni, Flaminio, Grimaldo, Francisco |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470276/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117870 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.210681 |
Ejemplares similares
-
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
por: Bravo, Giangiacomo, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Gender gap in journal submissions and peer review during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. A study on 2329 Elsevier journals
por: Squazzoni, Flaminio, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Assessing peer review by gauging the fate of rejected manuscripts: the case of the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
por: Casnici, Niccolò, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
Measuring the developmental function of peer review: a multi-dimensional, cross-disciplinary analysis of peer review reports from 740 academic journals
por: Garcia-Costa, Daniel, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Network Based Scoring Models to Improve Credit Risk Management in Peer to Peer Lending Platforms
por: Giudici, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2019)