Cargando…
Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review
Purpose Systematic evaluation of health apps designed to support and aid remote monitoring of patients during breast cancer treatment and aftercare. Method A systematic search and assessment of apps was conducted using search terms: breast cancer; breast cancer therapy; and breast cancer aftercare....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2022
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1909-8736 |
_version_ | 1784788808096546816 |
---|---|
author | Gomm, Susanne Ingrid Marianne Ebner, Florian K. Lukac, Stefan El Taie, Ziad Janni, Wolfgang Schmidt-Straßburger, Uta Stoinschek, Barbara Dayan, Davut |
author_facet | Gomm, Susanne Ingrid Marianne Ebner, Florian K. Lukac, Stefan El Taie, Ziad Janni, Wolfgang Schmidt-Straßburger, Uta Stoinschek, Barbara Dayan, Davut |
author_sort | Gomm, Susanne Ingrid Marianne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Purpose Systematic evaluation of health apps designed to support and aid remote monitoring of patients during breast cancer treatment and aftercare. Method A systematic search and assessment of apps was conducted using search terms: breast cancer; breast cancer therapy; and breast cancer aftercare. Evaluation criteria were user assessments, scientifically published benefits, user-friendliness, data protection, app individualization, motivation, and financial aspects. Up to two points (P) could be awarded per criterion. The lowest possible score was 0P and the maximum was 28P. Three examiners from different institutions independently assessed the apps according to the specified criteria. Reference value was defined as the average value given by the examiners. Apps with > 18P were classified as “recommended”; ≥ 11–≤ 18P as “partially recommended” and ≤ 10P as “not recommended”. Results A total of 776 apps (n = 24 from the Apple App Store, n = 752 from the Google Play Store) were identified via search query. After applying exclusion criteria, 36 apps (n = 1 from the Apple App Store; n = 35 from the Google Play Store) were evaluated. Using the mean point values of the examiners, 20 apps were classified as not recommended and 12 as partially recommended (≥ 11–≤ 18P). Four apps were rated partially recommended by two examiners and recommended by one examiner. Three apps were rated as recommended by all examiners. Conclusion Only a small minority of available apps meet recommendation criteria. Use of these apps may benefit breast cancer patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9470289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94702892022-09-14 Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review Gomm, Susanne Ingrid Marianne Ebner, Florian K. Lukac, Stefan El Taie, Ziad Janni, Wolfgang Schmidt-Straßburger, Uta Stoinschek, Barbara Dayan, Davut Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd Purpose Systematic evaluation of health apps designed to support and aid remote monitoring of patients during breast cancer treatment and aftercare. Method A systematic search and assessment of apps was conducted using search terms: breast cancer; breast cancer therapy; and breast cancer aftercare. Evaluation criteria were user assessments, scientifically published benefits, user-friendliness, data protection, app individualization, motivation, and financial aspects. Up to two points (P) could be awarded per criterion. The lowest possible score was 0P and the maximum was 28P. Three examiners from different institutions independently assessed the apps according to the specified criteria. Reference value was defined as the average value given by the examiners. Apps with > 18P were classified as “recommended”; ≥ 11–≤ 18P as “partially recommended” and ≤ 10P as “not recommended”. Results A total of 776 apps (n = 24 from the Apple App Store, n = 752 from the Google Play Store) were identified via search query. After applying exclusion criteria, 36 apps (n = 1 from the Apple App Store; n = 35 from the Google Play Store) were evaluated. Using the mean point values of the examiners, 20 apps were classified as not recommended and 12 as partially recommended (≥ 11–≤ 18P). Four apps were rated partially recommended by two examiners and recommended by one examiner. Three apps were rated as recommended by all examiners. Conclusion Only a small minority of available apps meet recommendation criteria. Use of these apps may benefit breast cancer patients. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9470289/ /pubmed/36110893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1909-8736 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Gomm, Susanne Ingrid Marianne Ebner, Florian K. Lukac, Stefan El Taie, Ziad Janni, Wolfgang Schmidt-Straßburger, Uta Stoinschek, Barbara Dayan, Davut Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title | Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title_full | Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title_short | Mobile Applications Available in Germany Supporting Breast Cancer Patients During Treatment and Aftercare: a Systematic Review |
title_sort | mobile applications available in germany supporting breast cancer patients during treatment and aftercare: a systematic review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36110893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1909-8736 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gommsusanneingridmarianne mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT ebnerfloriank mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT lukacstefan mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT eltaieziad mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT janniwolfgang mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT schmidtstraßburgeruta mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT stoinschekbarbara mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview AT dayandavut mobileapplicationsavailableingermanysupportingbreastcancerpatientsduringtreatmentandaftercareasystematicreview |