Cargando…

Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study

OBJECTIVES: This double-blind crossover-controlled trial aimed to verify the effect of electrical stimulation therapy on pressure injuries with undermining. METHODS: : In this trial, we compared the healing rates between a sham period and a treatment period using monophasic pulsed microcurrent thera...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki, Hiramatsu, Terutaka, Sugimoto, Masaharu, Uemura, Mikiko, Mori, Yuki, Ichibori, Ryoko
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JARM 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160025
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20220045
_version_ 1784788858788904960
author Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki
Hiramatsu, Terutaka
Sugimoto, Masaharu
Uemura, Mikiko
Mori, Yuki
Ichibori, Ryoko
author_facet Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki
Hiramatsu, Terutaka
Sugimoto, Masaharu
Uemura, Mikiko
Mori, Yuki
Ichibori, Ryoko
author_sort Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This double-blind crossover-controlled trial aimed to verify the effect of electrical stimulation therapy on pressure injuries with undermining. METHODS: : In this trial, we compared the healing rates between a sham period and a treatment period using monophasic pulsed microcurrent therapy. The participants were randomly assigned to the sham or treatment group and received stimulation for 2 weeks. All the participants, physical therapists, and researchers were blinded to the allocation. For the main analysis, data on the effect of the intervention on changes in weekly healing and contraction rates of the wound areas, including undermining, were analyzed based on a two-period crossover study design. The intervention effect was estimated by examining the mean treatment difference for each period using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. RESULTS: : The reduction of the entire wound area, including the undermining area, resulted in significantly higher healing and contraction rates in the treatment group (overall wound area reduction rate: contraction rate, P=0.008; period healing rate, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: : Electrical stimulation therapy for pressure injuries, using conditions based on the findings of an in vivo culture study, was effective in reducing the wound area.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9470497
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JARM
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94704972022-09-23 Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki Hiramatsu, Terutaka Sugimoto, Masaharu Uemura, Mikiko Mori, Yuki Ichibori, Ryoko Prog Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVES: This double-blind crossover-controlled trial aimed to verify the effect of electrical stimulation therapy on pressure injuries with undermining. METHODS: : In this trial, we compared the healing rates between a sham period and a treatment period using monophasic pulsed microcurrent therapy. The participants were randomly assigned to the sham or treatment group and received stimulation for 2 weeks. All the participants, physical therapists, and researchers were blinded to the allocation. For the main analysis, data on the effect of the intervention on changes in weekly healing and contraction rates of the wound areas, including undermining, were analyzed based on a two-period crossover study design. The intervention effect was estimated by examining the mean treatment difference for each period using Wilcoxon’s signed-rank test. RESULTS: : The reduction of the entire wound area, including the undermining area, resulted in significantly higher healing and contraction rates in the treatment group (overall wound area reduction rate: contraction rate, P=0.008; period healing rate, P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: : Electrical stimulation therapy for pressure injuries, using conditions based on the findings of an in vivo culture study, was effective in reducing the wound area. JARM 2022-09-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9470497/ /pubmed/36160025 http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20220045 Text en 2022 The Japanese Association of Rehabilitation Medicine https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 License.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoshikawa, Yoshiyuki
Hiramatsu, Terutaka
Sugimoto, Masaharu
Uemura, Mikiko
Mori, Yuki
Ichibori, Ryoko
Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title_full Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title_fullStr Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title_short Efficacy of Low-frequency Monophasic Pulsed Microcurrent Stimulation Therapy in Undermining Pressure Injury: A Double-blind Crossover-controlled Study
title_sort efficacy of low-frequency monophasic pulsed microcurrent stimulation therapy in undermining pressure injury: a double-blind crossover-controlled study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470497/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36160025
http://dx.doi.org/10.2490/prm.20220045
work_keys_str_mv AT yoshikawayoshiyuki efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy
AT hiramatsuterutaka efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy
AT sugimotomasaharu efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy
AT uemuramikiko efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy
AT moriyuki efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy
AT ichiboriryoko efficacyoflowfrequencymonophasicpulsedmicrocurrentstimulationtherapyinunderminingpressureinjuryadoubleblindcrossovercontrolledstudy