Cargando…
Lesser-Evil Justifications: A Reply to Frowe
Sometimes one can prevent harm only by contravening rights. If the harm one can prevent is great enough, compared to the stringency of the opposing rights, then one has a lesser-evil justification to contravene the rights. Non-consequentialist orthodoxy holds that, most of the time, lesser-evil just...
Autores principales: | Gordon-Solmon, Kerah, Pummer, Theron |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Netherlands
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470609/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10982-022-09454-w |
Ejemplares similares
-
Costs in medicine – the lesser of two evils
por: Skrzypczyk, Michał Andrzej, et al.
Publicado: (2014) -
Commentary: Closantel – A lesser-known evil
por: Venkatesh, Ramesh, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Violating the normality assumption may be the lesser of two evils
por: Knief, Ulrich, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Alternative tobacco products use and its impact on urologic health – will the lesser evil still be evil? A commentary and review of literature
por: Bjurlin, Marc A., et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Commentary: Axillary or femoral cannulation—Which is the lesser of 2 evils?
por: Takeda, Koji, et al.
Publicado: (2020)