Cargando…

Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons

PURPOSE: ‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive syste...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mulhern, Brendan J., Sampson, Chris, Haywood, Phil, Addo, Rebecca, Page, Katie, Mott, David, Shah, Koonal, Janssen, Mathieu F., Herdman, Mike
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03138-7
_version_ 1784788888401739776
author Mulhern, Brendan J.
Sampson, Chris
Haywood, Phil
Addo, Rebecca
Page, Katie
Mott, David
Shah, Koonal
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Herdman, Mike
author_facet Mulhern, Brendan J.
Sampson, Chris
Haywood, Phil
Addo, Rebecca
Page, Katie
Mott, David
Shah, Koonal
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Herdman, Mike
author_sort Mulhern, Brendan J.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: ‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors. METHODS: Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined. RESULTS: Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators. CONCLUSION: The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9470642
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94706422022-09-15 Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons Mulhern, Brendan J. Sampson, Chris Haywood, Phil Addo, Rebecca Page, Katie Mott, David Shah, Koonal Janssen, Mathieu F. Herdman, Mike Qual Life Res Article PURPOSE: ‘Bolt-on’ dimensions are additional items added to multi-attribute utility instruments (MAUIs) such as EQ-5D that measure constructs not included in the core descriptive system. The use of bolt-ons has been proposed to improve the content validity and responsiveness of the descriptive system in certain settings and health conditions. EQ-5D bolt-ons serve a particular purpose and thus satisfy a certain set of criteria. The aim of this paper is to propose a set of criteria to guide the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-on descriptors. METHODS: Criteria were developed using an iterative approach. First, existing criteria were identified from the literature including those used to guide the development of MAUIs, the COSMIN checklist and reviews of existing bolt-ons. Second, processes used to develop bolt-ons based on qualitative and quantitative approaches were considered. The information from these two stages was formalised into draft development and selection criteria. These were reviewed by the project team and iteratively refined. RESULTS: Overall, 23 criteria for the development, assessment and selection of candidate bolt-ons were formulated. Development criteria focused on issues relating to i) structure, ii) language, and iii) consistency with the existing EQ-5D dimension structure. Assessment and selection criteria focused on face and content validity and classical psychometric indicators. CONCLUSION: The criteria generated can be used to guide the development of bolt-ons across different health areas. They can also be used to assess existing bolt-ons, and inform their inclusion in studies and patient groups where the EQ-5D may lack content validity. Springer International Publishing 2022-04-29 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9470642/ /pubmed/35486216 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03138-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)
spellingShingle Article
Mulhern, Brendan J.
Sampson, Chris
Haywood, Phil
Addo, Rebecca
Page, Katie
Mott, David
Shah, Koonal
Janssen, Mathieu F.
Herdman, Mike
Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title_full Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title_fullStr Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title_full_unstemmed Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title_short Criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate EQ-5D bolt-ons
title_sort criteria for developing, assessing and selecting candidate eq-5d bolt-ons
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470642/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35486216
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-022-03138-7
work_keys_str_mv AT mulhernbrendanj criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT sampsonchris criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT haywoodphil criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT addorebecca criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT pagekatie criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT mottdavid criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT shahkoonal criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT janssenmathieuf criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons
AT herdmanmike criteriafordevelopingassessingandselectingcandidateeq5dboltons