Cargando…

Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms

PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) condi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha, Frietsch, Jochen J., Hilgendorf, Inken, Hochhaus, Andreas, Köhne, Claus-Henning, Casper, Jochen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8
_version_ 1784788894368137216
author O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Hochhaus, Andreas
Köhne, Claus-Henning
Casper, Jochen
author_facet O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Hochhaus, Andreas
Köhne, Claus-Henning
Casper, Jochen
author_sort O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9470667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94706672022-09-15 Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Hochhaus, Andreas Köhne, Claus-Henning Casper, Jochen J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9470667/ /pubmed/34674031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article – Clinical Oncology
O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha
Frietsch, Jochen J.
Hilgendorf, Inken
Hochhaus, Andreas
Köhne, Claus-Henning
Casper, Jochen
Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title_full Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title_fullStr Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title_full_unstemmed Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title_short Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
title_sort combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
topic Original Article – Clinical Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ohaganhendersonsamantha combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms
AT frietschjochenj combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms
AT hilgendorfinken combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms
AT hochhausandreas combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms
AT kohneclaushenning combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms
AT casperjochen combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms