Cargando…
Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms
PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) condi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8 |
_version_ | 1784788894368137216 |
---|---|
author | O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Hochhaus, Andreas Köhne, Claus-Henning Casper, Jochen |
author_facet | O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Hochhaus, Andreas Köhne, Claus-Henning Casper, Jochen |
author_sort | O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9470667 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94706672022-09-15 Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Hochhaus, Andreas Köhne, Claus-Henning Casper, Jochen J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Original Article – Clinical Oncology PURPOSE: Treosulfan and fludarabine (Treo/Flu) were successfully introduced into toxicity-reduced conditioning for SCT. However, the risk of post-SCT relapse remains a matter of concern. We report the results of a novel individual treatment approach with Treo/Flu and cytarabine (Treo/Flu/AraC) conditioning prior to allogeneic SCT in patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN). METHODS: Seventy-seven patients (median age 54 years) at high risk of disease relapse due to unfavorable cytogenetics or failure to achieve complete remission prior to SCT were included. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. RESULTS: The 1-, 2- and 3-year RFS rates were 49.4%, 41.7%, and 37.6% and OS rates were 59.3%, 49.3%, and 45.4%, respectively. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 10% at 100 days, 18.8% at 1 year and 20.1% at 2 years. The cumulative incidence of relapse increased from 31% at 1 year to 38.5% after 3 years. The cumulative incidences of engraftment, chimerism, graft-versus-host disease (GvHD) and toxicities were acceptable and comparable with similar patients conditioned with Treo/Flu or FLAMSA-RIC. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, Treo/Flu/AraC provides tolerable, feasible, and effective conditioning for patients with AML, MDS or MPN, even in advanced disease states. The incidence of NRM and relapse is acceptable in this heavily pre-treated population with high-risk disease. Future research will aim to confirm these initial findings and include a larger number of participants in a prospective trial. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-21 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9470667/ /pubmed/34674031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article – Clinical Oncology O‘Hagan Henderson, Samantha Frietsch, Jochen J. Hilgendorf, Inken Hochhaus, Andreas Köhne, Claus-Henning Casper, Jochen Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title | Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title_full | Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title_fullStr | Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title_full_unstemmed | Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title_short | Combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
title_sort | combination of treosulfan, fludarabine and cytarabine as conditioning in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome and myeloproliferative neoplasms |
topic | Original Article – Clinical Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470667/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34674031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-021-03836-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ohaganhendersonsamantha combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms AT frietschjochenj combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms AT hilgendorfinken combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms AT hochhausandreas combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms AT kohneclaushenning combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms AT casperjochen combinationoftreosulfanfludarabineandcytarabineasconditioninginpatientswithacutemyeloidleukemiamyelodysplasticsyndromeandmyeloproliferativeneoplasms |