Cargando…
Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI
BACKGROUND: Paraspinal musculature (PSM) is increasingly recognized as a contributor to low back pain (LBP), but with conventional MRI sequences, assessment is limited. Chemical shift encoding-based water–fat MRI (CSE-MRI) enables the measurement of PSM fat fraction (FF), which may assist investigat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28145 |
_version_ | 1784788917097070592 |
---|---|
author | Sollmann, Nico Bonnheim, Noah B. Joseph, Gabby B. Chachad, Ravi Zhou, Jiamin Akkaya, Zehra Pirmoazen, Amir M. Bailey, Jeannie F. Guo, Xiaojie Lazar, Ann A. Link, Thomas M. Fields, Aaron J. Krug, Roland |
author_facet | Sollmann, Nico Bonnheim, Noah B. Joseph, Gabby B. Chachad, Ravi Zhou, Jiamin Akkaya, Zehra Pirmoazen, Amir M. Bailey, Jeannie F. Guo, Xiaojie Lazar, Ann A. Link, Thomas M. Fields, Aaron J. Krug, Roland |
author_sort | Sollmann, Nico |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Paraspinal musculature (PSM) is increasingly recognized as a contributor to low back pain (LBP), but with conventional MRI sequences, assessment is limited. Chemical shift encoding-based water–fat MRI (CSE-MRI) enables the measurement of PSM fat fraction (FF), which may assist investigations of chronic LBP. PURPOSE: To investigate associations between PSM parameters from conventional MRI and CSE-MRI and between PSM parameters and pain. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, cross-sectional. POPULATION: Eighty-four adults with chronic LBP (44.6 ± 13.4 years; 48 males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, T1-weighted fast spin-echo and iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation sequences. ASSESSMENT: T1-weighted images for Goutallier classification (GC), muscle volume, lumbar indentation value, and muscle-fat index, CSE-MRI for FF extraction (L1/2–L5/S1). Pain was self-reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Intra- and/or interreader agreement was assessed for MRI-derived parameters. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mixed-effects and linear regression models to 1) assess relationships between PSM parameters (entire cohort and subgroup with GC grades 0 and 1; statistical significance α = 0.0025) and 2) evaluate associations of PSM parameters with pain (α = 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra- and/or interreader agreement. RESULTS: The FF showed excellent intra- and interreader agreement (ICC range: 0.97–0.99) and was significantly associated with GC at all spinal levels. Subgroup analysis suggested that early/subtle changes in PSM are detectable with FF but not with GC, given the absence of significant associations between FF and GC (P-value range: 0.036 at L5/S1 to 0.784 at L2/L3). Averaged over all spinal levels, FF and GC were significantly associated with VAS scores. DATA CONCLUSION: In the absence of FF, GC may be the best surrogate for PSM quality. Given the ability of CSE-MRI to detect muscle alterations at early stages of PSM degeneration, this technique may have potential for further investigations of the role of PSM in chronic LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9470775 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94707752023-11-01 Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI Sollmann, Nico Bonnheim, Noah B. Joseph, Gabby B. Chachad, Ravi Zhou, Jiamin Akkaya, Zehra Pirmoazen, Amir M. Bailey, Jeannie F. Guo, Xiaojie Lazar, Ann A. Link, Thomas M. Fields, Aaron J. Krug, Roland J Magn Reson Imaging Article BACKGROUND: Paraspinal musculature (PSM) is increasingly recognized as a contributor to low back pain (LBP), but with conventional MRI sequences, assessment is limited. Chemical shift encoding-based water–fat MRI (CSE-MRI) enables the measurement of PSM fat fraction (FF), which may assist investigations of chronic LBP. PURPOSE: To investigate associations between PSM parameters from conventional MRI and CSE-MRI and between PSM parameters and pain. STUDY TYPE: Prospective, cross-sectional. POPULATION: Eighty-four adults with chronic LBP (44.6 ± 13.4 years; 48 males). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3-T, T1-weighted fast spin-echo and iterative decomposition of water and fat with echo asymmetry and least squares estimation sequences. ASSESSMENT: T1-weighted images for Goutallier classification (GC), muscle volume, lumbar indentation value, and muscle-fat index, CSE-MRI for FF extraction (L1/2–L5/S1). Pain was self-reported using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Intra- and/or interreader agreement was assessed for MRI-derived parameters. STATISTICAL TESTS: Mixed-effects and linear regression models to 1) assess relationships between PSM parameters (entire cohort and subgroup with GC grades 0 and 1; statistical significance α = 0.0025) and 2) evaluate associations of PSM parameters with pain (α = 0.05). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) for intra- and/or interreader agreement. RESULTS: The FF showed excellent intra- and interreader agreement (ICC range: 0.97–0.99) and was significantly associated with GC at all spinal levels. Subgroup analysis suggested that early/subtle changes in PSM are detectable with FF but not with GC, given the absence of significant associations between FF and GC (P-value range: 0.036 at L5/S1 to 0.784 at L2/L3). Averaged over all spinal levels, FF and GC were significantly associated with VAS scores. DATA CONCLUSION: In the absence of FF, GC may be the best surrogate for PSM quality. Given the ability of CSE-MRI to detect muscle alterations at early stages of PSM degeneration, this technique may have potential for further investigations of the role of PSM in chronic LBP. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2 2022-11 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9470775/ /pubmed/35285561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28145 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes. |
spellingShingle | Article Sollmann, Nico Bonnheim, Noah B. Joseph, Gabby B. Chachad, Ravi Zhou, Jiamin Akkaya, Zehra Pirmoazen, Amir M. Bailey, Jeannie F. Guo, Xiaojie Lazar, Ann A. Link, Thomas M. Fields, Aaron J. Krug, Roland Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title | Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title_full | Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title_fullStr | Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title_full_unstemmed | Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title_short | Paraspinal Muscle in Chronic Low Back Pain: Comparison Between Standard Parameters and Chemical Shift Encoding-Based Water–Fat MRI |
title_sort | paraspinal muscle in chronic low back pain: comparison between standard parameters and chemical shift encoding-based water–fat mri |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9470775/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285561 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri.28145 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sollmannnico paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT bonnheimnoahb paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT josephgabbyb paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT chachadravi paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT zhoujiamin paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT akkayazehra paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT pirmoazenamirm paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT baileyjeannief paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT guoxiaojie paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT lazaranna paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT linkthomasm paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT fieldsaaronj paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri AT krugroland paraspinalmuscleinchroniclowbackpaincomparisonbetweenstandardparametersandchemicalshiftencodingbasedwaterfatmri |