Cargando…
Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of remote consolation and the evidence for its effectiveness, its adoption has been relatively limited (Hashiguchi, 2020). In light of COVID social distancing measures, there was an immediate requirement to adopt this technology into routine practice. OBJECTIVE...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Cambridge University Press
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471069/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.284 |
_version_ | 1784788984254169088 |
---|---|
author | Boughdady, M. Connah, L. Inman, J. Jaydeokar, S. Marnoch, D. Nathan, R. |
author_facet | Boughdady, M. Connah, L. Inman, J. Jaydeokar, S. Marnoch, D. Nathan, R. |
author_sort | Boughdady, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of remote consolation and the evidence for its effectiveness, its adoption has been relatively limited (Hashiguchi, 2020). In light of COVID social distancing measures, there was an immediate requirement to adopt this technology into routine practice. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this evaluation was to examine clinicians’ experiences of the urgent adoption of digital technology in a NHS provider of mental health and community physical health services. METHODS: From a staff survey (n=234) of experiences of working during a period when there were significant levels of Covid-related restrictions, data was extracted and subject to thematic analysis by a research team made up of clinicians, academics, and quality improvement specialists. RESULTS: Five key themes relevant to the urgent adoption of digital technology were identified (figure 1): (1) Availability of staff for patient contact was generally felt to be improved; (2) Quality of contact was reported to be variable (e.g. some respondents reporting better rapport with patients, whereas others found remote contact interfered with rapport building); (3) Safeguarding concerns were reported to be more difficult to identify through remote consultation; (4) Contingency plans were recommended to allow for vulnerable patients for whom remote consultation was a problem; (5) Multi-agency working was reported to be strengthened. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this evaluation allow for an informed approach to future adoption of remote consultation in routine practice. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9471069 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Cambridge University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94710692022-09-29 Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic Boughdady, M. Connah, L. Inman, J. Jaydeokar, S. Marnoch, D. Nathan, R. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Despite the availability of remote consolation and the evidence for its effectiveness, its adoption has been relatively limited (Hashiguchi, 2020). In light of COVID social distancing measures, there was an immediate requirement to adopt this technology into routine practice. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this evaluation was to examine clinicians’ experiences of the urgent adoption of digital technology in a NHS provider of mental health and community physical health services. METHODS: From a staff survey (n=234) of experiences of working during a period when there were significant levels of Covid-related restrictions, data was extracted and subject to thematic analysis by a research team made up of clinicians, academics, and quality improvement specialists. RESULTS: Five key themes relevant to the urgent adoption of digital technology were identified (figure 1): (1) Availability of staff for patient contact was generally felt to be improved; (2) Quality of contact was reported to be variable (e.g. some respondents reporting better rapport with patients, whereas others found remote contact interfered with rapport building); (3) Safeguarding concerns were reported to be more difficult to identify through remote consultation; (4) Contingency plans were recommended to allow for vulnerable patients for whom remote consultation was a problem; (5) Multi-agency working was reported to be strengthened. [Figure: see text] CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this evaluation allow for an informed approach to future adoption of remote consultation in routine practice. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9471069/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.284 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Abstract Boughdady, M. Connah, L. Inman, J. Jaydeokar, S. Marnoch, D. Nathan, R. Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: A survey of clinicians in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | professionals’ experience of the rapid implementation of a remote consultation model of healthcare: a survey of clinicians in the early stages of the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Abstract |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471069/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.284 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boughdadym professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic AT connahl professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic AT inmanj professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic AT jaydeokars professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic AT marnochd professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic AT nathanr professionalsexperienceoftherapidimplementationofaremoteconsultationmodelofhealthcareasurveyofcliniciansintheearlystagesofthecovid19pandemic |