Cargando…

Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning

INTRODUCTION: Machine learning has increasingly been applied to classification of psychosis spectrum in neuroimaging research. However, a number of multimodal studies using MRI and electroencephalography (EEG) is quite limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the power of multimodal structural MRI (sMRI) and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tomyshev, A., Lutsyak, N., Belyaev, M., Kaleda, V., Lebedeva, I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1097
_version_ 1784789024642170880
author Tomyshev, A.
Lutsyak, N.
Belyaev, M.
Kaleda, V.
Lebedeva, I.
author_facet Tomyshev, A.
Lutsyak, N.
Belyaev, M.
Kaleda, V.
Lebedeva, I.
author_sort Tomyshev, A.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Machine learning has increasingly been applied to classification of psychosis spectrum in neuroimaging research. However, a number of multimodal studies using MRI and electroencephalography (EEG) is quite limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the power of multimodal structural MRI (sMRI) and EEG data to provide pairwise discrimination between first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients, individuals at ultra-high-risk of psychosis (UHR), and healthy controls (HC) using machine learning algorithms. METHODS: 46 FES male patients, 39 UHR individuals, and 54 matched HC underwent sMRI (3T Philips scanner) and electroencephalography. T1-weighted images were processed via FreeSurfer to obtain cortical and subcortical measures. L2 regularized logistic regression was used to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic prediction. RESULTS: The accuracies of pairwise discriminations were: 87% for FES vs HC (specificity 83%, sensitivity 91%); 77% for FES vs UHR (specificity 76%, sensitivity 79%); 75% for UHR vs HC (specificity 77%, sensitivity 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that the patterns of anatomical and functional variability have potential as biomarkers for discrimination between schizophrenia, UHR, and healthy subjects. Furthermore, results show that the selection and multimodality of feature types are important. Specifically, adding EEG data to morphometric measures improved accuracy rates in FES vs HC and FES vs UHR contrasts, whereas standalone EEG data provided higher accuracy compared with morphometric or multimodal data in UHR vs HC discrimination. Expectedly, predictive power for the UHR was smaller than for the FES due to its intermediate anatomical features, located between those observed in healthy controls and those found in patients. The work was supported by RFBR grant 20-013-00748
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9471231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94712312022-09-29 Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning Tomyshev, A. Lutsyak, N. Belyaev, M. Kaleda, V. Lebedeva, I. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Machine learning has increasingly been applied to classification of psychosis spectrum in neuroimaging research. However, a number of multimodal studies using MRI and electroencephalography (EEG) is quite limited. OBJECTIVES: To assess the power of multimodal structural MRI (sMRI) and EEG data to provide pairwise discrimination between first-episode schizophrenia (FES) patients, individuals at ultra-high-risk of psychosis (UHR), and healthy controls (HC) using machine learning algorithms. METHODS: 46 FES male patients, 39 UHR individuals, and 54 matched HC underwent sMRI (3T Philips scanner) and electroencephalography. T1-weighted images were processed via FreeSurfer to obtain cortical and subcortical measures. L2 regularized logistic regression was used to evaluate the efficacy of diagnostic prediction. RESULTS: The accuracies of pairwise discriminations were: 87% for FES vs HC (specificity 83%, sensitivity 91%); 77% for FES vs UHR (specificity 76%, sensitivity 79%); 75% for UHR vs HC (specificity 77%, sensitivity 73%). CONCLUSIONS: Current findings suggest that the patterns of anatomical and functional variability have potential as biomarkers for discrimination between schizophrenia, UHR, and healthy subjects. Furthermore, results show that the selection and multimodality of feature types are important. Specifically, adding EEG data to morphometric measures improved accuracy rates in FES vs HC and FES vs UHR contrasts, whereas standalone EEG data provided higher accuracy compared with morphometric or multimodal data in UHR vs HC discrimination. Expectedly, predictive power for the UHR was smaller than for the FES due to its intermediate anatomical features, located between those observed in healthy controls and those found in patients. The work was supported by RFBR grant 20-013-00748 Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9471231/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1097 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Tomyshev, A.
Lutsyak, N.
Belyaev, M.
Kaleda, V.
Lebedeva, I.
Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title_full Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title_fullStr Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title_full_unstemmed Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title_short Classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
title_sort classification of first-episode schizophrenia patients, individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis, and healthy controls using structural mri, eeg, and machine learning
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471231/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.1097
work_keys_str_mv AT tomysheva classificationoffirstepisodeschizophreniapatientsindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsusingstructuralmrieegandmachinelearning
AT lutsyakn classificationoffirstepisodeschizophreniapatientsindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsusingstructuralmrieegandmachinelearning
AT belyaevm classificationoffirstepisodeschizophreniapatientsindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsusingstructuralmrieegandmachinelearning
AT kaledav classificationoffirstepisodeschizophreniapatientsindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsusingstructuralmrieegandmachinelearning
AT lebedevai classificationoffirstepisodeschizophreniapatientsindividualsatultrahighriskforpsychosisandhealthycontrolsusingstructuralmrieegandmachinelearning