Cargando…

Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival

INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an intriguing act of the human being. The reasons behind the violation of an instinct for survival is far from being understood. Besides, the emergence of assisted dying is raising even more questions about the concept of rational suicide, defined as a well-thought-out decis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Torres, S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471734/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.467
_version_ 1784789144623382528
author Torres, S.
author_facet Torres, S.
author_sort Torres, S.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an intriguing act of the human being. The reasons behind the violation of an instinct for survival is far from being understood. Besides, the emergence of assisted dying is raising even more questions about the concept of rational suicide, defined as a well-thought-out decision to die by whom is mentally competent. OBJECTIVES: Understand the concept of rational suicide, in parallel with suicide, by exploring the views on this debate over the years and elucidating the relationship with mental disorders, mental capacity and patient’s rights. METHODS: Literature review performed on PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using the keywords “rational suicide”, “assisted death”, “suicide”, “phenomenology”, “mental capacity” and “responsibility for life”. RESULTS: The theological condemnations of suicide – as sin or crime – were put aside with psychiatric development in the last century. Durkheim was the first important precursor of the contemporary view - suicide is a form of mental illness (psychosis or depression) not compatible with rational deliberation. With the increasingly open debate on assisted dying, this vision is being tested by cases of terminally ill patients subjected to experiences that many wouldn’t choose to tolerate. Moral right to self-determination and needless suffering are examples of arguments in favor of rational suicide. CONCLUSIONS: The need for an open discussion about rational suicide is raising, specifically in relation to psychiatric disorders, mainly to resolve the conflict between the duty of care of psychiatrists and the autonomy of patients. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9471734
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94717342022-09-29 Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival Torres, S. Eur Psychiatry Abstract INTRODUCTION: Suicide is an intriguing act of the human being. The reasons behind the violation of an instinct for survival is far from being understood. Besides, the emergence of assisted dying is raising even more questions about the concept of rational suicide, defined as a well-thought-out decision to die by whom is mentally competent. OBJECTIVES: Understand the concept of rational suicide, in parallel with suicide, by exploring the views on this debate over the years and elucidating the relationship with mental disorders, mental capacity and patient’s rights. METHODS: Literature review performed on PubMed and Google Scholar databases, using the keywords “rational suicide”, “assisted death”, “suicide”, “phenomenology”, “mental capacity” and “responsibility for life”. RESULTS: The theological condemnations of suicide – as sin or crime – were put aside with psychiatric development in the last century. Durkheim was the first important precursor of the contemporary view - suicide is a form of mental illness (psychosis or depression) not compatible with rational deliberation. With the increasingly open debate on assisted dying, this vision is being tested by cases of terminally ill patients subjected to experiences that many wouldn’t choose to tolerate. Moral right to self-determination and needless suffering are examples of arguments in favor of rational suicide. CONCLUSIONS: The need for an open discussion about rational suicide is raising, specifically in relation to psychiatric disorders, mainly to resolve the conflict between the duty of care of psychiatrists and the autonomy of patients. DISCLOSURE: No significant relationships. Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9471734/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.467 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Torres, S.
Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title_full Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title_fullStr Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title_full_unstemmed Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title_short Rational suicide: The paradigm of survival
title_sort rational suicide: the paradigm of survival
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471734/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.467
work_keys_str_mv AT torress rationalsuicidetheparadigmofsurvival