Cargando…

Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT

OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be rapidly effective in treating severe depression. Right unilateral (RUL) or bitemporal (BT) electrode placement may affect the speed of ECT effectiveness although our current understanding of demographic and clinical factors for predicting predict spe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mcloughlin, D., Fox, C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471856/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.83
_version_ 1784789174819225600
author Mcloughlin, D.
Fox, C.
author_facet Mcloughlin, D.
Fox, C.
author_sort Mcloughlin, D.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be rapidly effective in treating severe depression. Right unilateral (RUL) or bitemporal (BT) electrode placement may affect the speed of ECT effectiveness although our current understanding of demographic and clinical factors for predicting predict speed of response and remission with ECT is limited. We investigated differences in improvement speed and also time to achieving response and remission criteria between brief-pulse moderate-dose (1.5 x seizure threshold) BT ECT and high-dose (6 x seizure threshold) RUL ECT. Additionally, we explored the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Se analysed weekly 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores obtained from severely depressed patients participating in the EFFECT-Dep trial (ISRCTN23577151). Improvement speeds in patients treated randomly with a course of either BT (n = 69) or RUL ECT (n = 69) were compared using independent sample t-tests. Weekly proportions of responders and remitters were compared using chi-square tests. Cox regression analyses were used to explore predictors of speed to achieve response and remission status. RESULTS: Se found no differences between RUL and BT ECT in speed of improvement or time to achieve response or remission. Exploratory analyses indicated that a wide variety of demographic and clinical features did not serve to predict speed of response and remission to ECT. CONCLUSION: Electrode placement did not substantially influence speed of improvement, response and remission with twice-weekly brief-pulse ECT. Minimising the cognitive side-effects of ECT may be of more relevance when choosing between BT and RUL electrode placement for ECT. DISCLOSURE: Declan M. McLoughlin has received speaker’s honoraria from Mecta and Otsuka and an honorarium from Janssen for participating in an esketamine advisory board meeting. The other author reports no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by awards from
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9471856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94718562022-09-29 Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT Mcloughlin, D. Fox, C. Eur Psychiatry Abstract OBJECTIVE: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) can be rapidly effective in treating severe depression. Right unilateral (RUL) or bitemporal (BT) electrode placement may affect the speed of ECT effectiveness although our current understanding of demographic and clinical factors for predicting predict speed of response and remission with ECT is limited. We investigated differences in improvement speed and also time to achieving response and remission criteria between brief-pulse moderate-dose (1.5 x seizure threshold) BT ECT and high-dose (6 x seizure threshold) RUL ECT. Additionally, we explored the influence of demographic and clinical characteristics. METHODS: Se analysed weekly 24-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores obtained from severely depressed patients participating in the EFFECT-Dep trial (ISRCTN23577151). Improvement speeds in patients treated randomly with a course of either BT (n = 69) or RUL ECT (n = 69) were compared using independent sample t-tests. Weekly proportions of responders and remitters were compared using chi-square tests. Cox regression analyses were used to explore predictors of speed to achieve response and remission status. RESULTS: Se found no differences between RUL and BT ECT in speed of improvement or time to achieve response or remission. Exploratory analyses indicated that a wide variety of demographic and clinical features did not serve to predict speed of response and remission to ECT. CONCLUSION: Electrode placement did not substantially influence speed of improvement, response and remission with twice-weekly brief-pulse ECT. Minimising the cognitive side-effects of ECT may be of more relevance when choosing between BT and RUL electrode placement for ECT. DISCLOSURE: Declan M. McLoughlin has received speaker’s honoraria from Mecta and Otsuka and an honorarium from Janssen for participating in an esketamine advisory board meeting. The other author reports no conflicts of interest. This work was supported by awards from Cambridge University Press 2021-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9471856/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.83 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Abstract
Mcloughlin, D.
Fox, C.
Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title_full Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title_fullStr Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title_full_unstemmed Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title_short Effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ECT
title_sort effect of electrode placement on speed of response to ect
topic Abstract
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471856/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.83
work_keys_str_mv AT mcloughlind effectofelectrodeplacementonspeedofresponsetoect
AT foxc effectofelectrodeplacementonspeedofresponsetoect