Cargando…
Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocogni...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763 |
_version_ | 1784789177547620352 |
---|---|
author | Koo, Se Jun Kim, Ye Jin Seo, Eunchong Park, Hye Yoon Min, Jee Eun Bang, Minji Park, Jin Young Lee, Eun An, Suk Kyoon |
author_facet | Koo, Se Jun Kim, Ye Jin Seo, Eunchong Park, Hye Yoon Min, Jee Eun Bang, Minji Park, Jin Young Lee, Eun An, Suk Kyoon |
author_sort | Koo, Se Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and attribution bias. METHODS: A total of 198 (101 females) non-clinical youths were recruited. To assess their neurocognitive ability and ToM skills, the participants were asked to complete Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) and the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test (K-RMET). To determine their personality traits, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (psychoticism) and interpersonal reactivity index (perspective taking) were used. To evaluate hostile attribution bias, the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire was administered. Path analysis and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap methods were used to estimate model fit and the parameters of the mediating effects. RESULTS: Based on model comparison, the best model characterized (1) two direct pathways from psychoticism and the K-RMET to hostility attribution bias and (2) three indirect pathways, wherein SPM, perspective taking, and psychoticism influenced hostile attribution bias through K-RMET. The final model fit indices were good [x(2)/df = 1.126; comparative fit index = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation = 0.026; standard root mean square residual = 0.026 and Akaike information criterion = 28.251] and the K-RMET fully mediated the association between SPM, perspective taking, psychoticism, and hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggested that ToM skills, such as the RMET, play an important role in explaining the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and hostile attribution bias. ToM skills and a remediation strategy may need to be developed to balance the enhanced hostility bias that underlies the paranoia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9471867 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94718672022-09-15 Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator Koo, Se Jun Kim, Ye Jin Seo, Eunchong Park, Hye Yoon Min, Jee Eun Bang, Minji Park, Jin Young Lee, Eun An, Suk Kyoon Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and attribution bias. METHODS: A total of 198 (101 females) non-clinical youths were recruited. To assess their neurocognitive ability and ToM skills, the participants were asked to complete Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) and the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test (K-RMET). To determine their personality traits, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (psychoticism) and interpersonal reactivity index (perspective taking) were used. To evaluate hostile attribution bias, the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire was administered. Path analysis and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap methods were used to estimate model fit and the parameters of the mediating effects. RESULTS: Based on model comparison, the best model characterized (1) two direct pathways from psychoticism and the K-RMET to hostility attribution bias and (2) three indirect pathways, wherein SPM, perspective taking, and psychoticism influenced hostile attribution bias through K-RMET. The final model fit indices were good [x(2)/df = 1.126; comparative fit index = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation = 0.026; standard root mean square residual = 0.026 and Akaike information criterion = 28.251] and the K-RMET fully mediated the association between SPM, perspective taking, psychoticism, and hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggested that ToM skills, such as the RMET, play an important role in explaining the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and hostile attribution bias. ToM skills and a remediation strategy may need to be developed to balance the enhanced hostility bias that underlies the paranoia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9471867/ /pubmed/36118475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763 Text en Copyright © 2022 Koo, Kim, Seo, Park, Min, Bang, Park, Lee and An. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Koo, Se Jun Kim, Ye Jin Seo, Eunchong Park, Hye Yoon Min, Jee Eun Bang, Minji Park, Jin Young Lee, Eun An, Suk Kyoon Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title | Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title_full | Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title_fullStr | Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title_full_unstemmed | Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title_short | Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator |
title_sort | relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: theory of mind as a mediator |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471867/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koosejun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT kimyejin relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT seoeunchong relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT parkhyeyoon relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT minjeeeun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT bangminji relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT parkjinyoung relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT leeeun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator AT ansukkyoon relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator |