Cargando…

Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator

OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocogni...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koo, Se Jun, Kim, Ye Jin, Seo, Eunchong, Park, Hye Yoon, Min, Jee Eun, Bang, Minji, Park, Jin Young, Lee, Eun, An, Suk Kyoon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763
_version_ 1784789177547620352
author Koo, Se Jun
Kim, Ye Jin
Seo, Eunchong
Park, Hye Yoon
Min, Jee Eun
Bang, Minji
Park, Jin Young
Lee, Eun
An, Suk Kyoon
author_facet Koo, Se Jun
Kim, Ye Jin
Seo, Eunchong
Park, Hye Yoon
Min, Jee Eun
Bang, Minji
Park, Jin Young
Lee, Eun
An, Suk Kyoon
author_sort Koo, Se Jun
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and attribution bias. METHODS: A total of 198 (101 females) non-clinical youths were recruited. To assess their neurocognitive ability and ToM skills, the participants were asked to complete Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) and the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test (K-RMET). To determine their personality traits, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (psychoticism) and interpersonal reactivity index (perspective taking) were used. To evaluate hostile attribution bias, the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire was administered. Path analysis and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap methods were used to estimate model fit and the parameters of the mediating effects. RESULTS: Based on model comparison, the best model characterized (1) two direct pathways from psychoticism and the K-RMET to hostility attribution bias and (2) three indirect pathways, wherein SPM, perspective taking, and psychoticism influenced hostile attribution bias through K-RMET. The final model fit indices were good [x(2)/df = 1.126; comparative fit index = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation = 0.026; standard root mean square residual = 0.026 and Akaike information criterion = 28.251] and the K-RMET fully mediated the association between SPM, perspective taking, psychoticism, and hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggested that ToM skills, such as the RMET, play an important role in explaining the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and hostile attribution bias. ToM skills and a remediation strategy may need to be developed to balance the enhanced hostility bias that underlies the paranoia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9471867
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94718672022-09-15 Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator Koo, Se Jun Kim, Ye Jin Seo, Eunchong Park, Hye Yoon Min, Jee Eun Bang, Minji Park, Jin Young Lee, Eun An, Suk Kyoon Front Psychol Psychology OBJECTIVES: Hostile attribution bias is reportedly common from non-clinical population to those with serious mental illness, such as schizophrenia, and is known to be closely related to theory of mind (ToM). This study aimed to investigate whether ToM skills mediate the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and attribution bias. METHODS: A total of 198 (101 females) non-clinical youths were recruited. To assess their neurocognitive ability and ToM skills, the participants were asked to complete Raven’s Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM) and the Korean version of the Reading the Mind in Eyes Test (K-RMET). To determine their personality traits, the Eysenck Personality Questionnaire (psychoticism) and interpersonal reactivity index (perspective taking) were used. To evaluate hostile attribution bias, the Ambiguous Intentions Hostility Questionnaire was administered. Path analysis and bias-corrected percentile bootstrap methods were used to estimate model fit and the parameters of the mediating effects. RESULTS: Based on model comparison, the best model characterized (1) two direct pathways from psychoticism and the K-RMET to hostility attribution bias and (2) three indirect pathways, wherein SPM, perspective taking, and psychoticism influenced hostile attribution bias through K-RMET. The final model fit indices were good [x(2)/df = 1.126; comparative fit index = 0.996; root mean square error of approximation = 0.026; standard root mean square residual = 0.026 and Akaike information criterion = 28.251] and the K-RMET fully mediated the association between SPM, perspective taking, psychoticism, and hostile attribution bias. CONCLUSION: The main findings suggested that ToM skills, such as the RMET, play an important role in explaining the relationship among neurocognitive ability, personality traits, and hostile attribution bias. ToM skills and a remediation strategy may need to be developed to balance the enhanced hostility bias that underlies the paranoia. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9471867/ /pubmed/36118475 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763 Text en Copyright © 2022 Koo, Kim, Seo, Park, Min, Bang, Park, Lee and An. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Koo, Se Jun
Kim, Ye Jin
Seo, Eunchong
Park, Hye Yoon
Min, Jee Eun
Bang, Minji
Park, Jin Young
Lee, Eun
An, Suk Kyoon
Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title_full Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title_fullStr Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title_full_unstemmed Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title_short Relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: Theory of mind as a mediator
title_sort relationship of neurocognitive ability, perspective taking, and psychoticism with hostile attribution bias in non-clinical participants: theory of mind as a mediator
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9471867/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36118475
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.863763
work_keys_str_mv AT koosejun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT kimyejin relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT seoeunchong relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT parkhyeyoon relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT minjeeeun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT bangminji relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT parkjinyoung relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT leeeun relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator
AT ansukkyoon relationshipofneurocognitiveabilityperspectivetakingandpsychoticismwithhostileattributionbiasinnonclinicalparticipantstheoryofmindasamediator