Cargando…

Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to explore the effectiveness of the National Health Inequality Strategy, which was conducted in England between 1999 and 2010. DESIGN: Three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for articles published tha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Holdroyd, Ian, Vodden, Alice, Srinivasan, Akash, Kuhn, Isla, Bambra, Clare, Ford, John Alexander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36134765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063137
_version_ 1784789236668432384
author Holdroyd, Ian
Vodden, Alice
Srinivasan, Akash
Kuhn, Isla
Bambra, Clare
Ford, John Alexander
author_facet Holdroyd, Ian
Vodden, Alice
Srinivasan, Akash
Kuhn, Isla
Bambra, Clare
Ford, John Alexander
author_sort Holdroyd, Ian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to explore the effectiveness of the National Health Inequality Strategy, which was conducted in England between 1999 and 2010. DESIGN: Three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for articles published that reported on changes in inequalities in health outcomes in England over the implementation period. Articles published between January 1999 and November 2021 were included. Title and abstracts were screened according to an eligibility criteria. Data were extracted from eligible studies, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 10 311 unique studies, which were screened. 42 were reviewed in full text and 11 were included in the final review. Six studies contained data on inequalities of life expectancy or mortality, four on disease-specific mortality, three on infant mortality and three on morbidities. Early government reports suggested that inequalities in life expectancy and infant mortality had increased. However, later publications using more accurate data and more appropriate measures found that absolute and relative inequalities had decreased throughout the strategy period for both measures. Three of four studies found a narrowing of inequalities in all-cause mortality. Absolute inequalities in mortality due to cancer and cardiovascular disease decreased, but relative inequalities increased. There was a lack of change, or widening of inequalities in mental health, self-reported health, health-related quality of life and long-term conditions. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to its aims, the strategy was broadly successful. Policymakers should take courage that progress on health inequalities is achievable with long-term, multiagency, cross-government action. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285770).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9472114
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94721142022-09-15 Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010 Holdroyd, Ian Vodden, Alice Srinivasan, Akash Kuhn, Isla Bambra, Clare Ford, John Alexander BMJ Open Public Health OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this systematic review is to explore the effectiveness of the National Health Inequality Strategy, which was conducted in England between 1999 and 2010. DESIGN: Three databases (Ovid Medline, Embase and PsycINFO) and grey literature were searched for articles published that reported on changes in inequalities in health outcomes in England over the implementation period. Articles published between January 1999 and November 2021 were included. Title and abstracts were screened according to an eligibility criteria. Data were extracted from eligible studies, and risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. RESULTS: The search strategy identified 10 311 unique studies, which were screened. 42 were reviewed in full text and 11 were included in the final review. Six studies contained data on inequalities of life expectancy or mortality, four on disease-specific mortality, three on infant mortality and three on morbidities. Early government reports suggested that inequalities in life expectancy and infant mortality had increased. However, later publications using more accurate data and more appropriate measures found that absolute and relative inequalities had decreased throughout the strategy period for both measures. Three of four studies found a narrowing of inequalities in all-cause mortality. Absolute inequalities in mortality due to cancer and cardiovascular disease decreased, but relative inequalities increased. There was a lack of change, or widening of inequalities in mental health, self-reported health, health-related quality of life and long-term conditions. CONCLUSIONS: With respect to its aims, the strategy was broadly successful. Policymakers should take courage that progress on health inequalities is achievable with long-term, multiagency, cross-government action. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42021285770). BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9472114/ /pubmed/36134765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063137 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Public Health
Holdroyd, Ian
Vodden, Alice
Srinivasan, Akash
Kuhn, Isla
Bambra, Clare
Ford, John Alexander
Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title_full Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title_fullStr Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title_short Systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in England between 1999 and 2010
title_sort systematic review of the effectiveness of the health inequalities strategy in england between 1999 and 2010
topic Public Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472114/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36134765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063137
work_keys_str_mv AT holdroydian systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010
AT voddenalice systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010
AT srinivasanakash systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010
AT kuhnisla systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010
AT bambraclare systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010
AT fordjohnalexander systematicreviewoftheeffectivenessofthehealthinequalitiesstrategyinenglandbetween1999and2010