Cargando…
Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumour with a median overall survival of 12–15 months (range 6–17 months), even with maximal treatment involving debulking neurosurgery and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The use of postoperative imaging to detect progres...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063043 |
_version_ | 1784789247177261056 |
---|---|
author | Gillespie, Conor S Bligh, Emily R Poon, Michael T C Solomou, Georgios Islim, Abdurrahman I Mustafa, Mohammad A Rominiyi, Ola Williams, Sophie T Kalra, Neeraj Mathew, Ryan K Booth, Thomas C Thompson, Gerard Brennan, Paul M Jenkinson, Michael D |
author_facet | Gillespie, Conor S Bligh, Emily R Poon, Michael T C Solomou, Georgios Islim, Abdurrahman I Mustafa, Mohammad A Rominiyi, Ola Williams, Sophie T Kalra, Neeraj Mathew, Ryan K Booth, Thomas C Thompson, Gerard Brennan, Paul M Jenkinson, Michael D |
author_sort | Gillespie, Conor S |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumour with a median overall survival of 12–15 months (range 6–17 months), even with maximal treatment involving debulking neurosurgery and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The use of postoperative imaging to detect progression is of high importance to clinicians and patients, but currently, the optimal follow-up schedule is yet to be defined. It is also unclear how adhering to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines—which are based on general consensus rather than evidence—affects patient outcomes such as progression-free and overall survival. The primary aim of this study is to assess MRI monitoring practice after surgery for glioblastoma, and to evaluate its association with patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ImagiNg Timing aftER surgery for glioblastoma: an eVALuation of practice in Great Britain and Ireland is a retrospective multicentre study that will include 450 patients with an operated glioblastoma, treated with any adjuvant therapy regimen in the UK and Ireland. Adult patients ≥18 years diagnosed with glioblastoma and undergoing surgery between 1 August 2018 and 1 February 2019 will be included. Clinical and radiological scanning data will be collected until the date of death or date of last known follow-up. Anonymised data will be uploaded to an online Castor database. Adherence to NICE guidelines and the effect of being concordant with NICE guidelines will be identified using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Each participating centre is required to gain local institutional approval for data collection and sharing. Formal ethical approval is not required since this is a service evaluation. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed presentations and articles, and will be disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9472166 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94721662022-09-15 Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study Gillespie, Conor S Bligh, Emily R Poon, Michael T C Solomou, Georgios Islim, Abdurrahman I Mustafa, Mohammad A Rominiyi, Ola Williams, Sophie T Kalra, Neeraj Mathew, Ryan K Booth, Thomas C Thompson, Gerard Brennan, Paul M Jenkinson, Michael D BMJ Open Oncology INTRODUCTION: Glioblastoma is the most common malignant primary brain tumour with a median overall survival of 12–15 months (range 6–17 months), even with maximal treatment involving debulking neurosurgery and adjuvant concomitant chemoradiotherapy. The use of postoperative imaging to detect progression is of high importance to clinicians and patients, but currently, the optimal follow-up schedule is yet to be defined. It is also unclear how adhering to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines—which are based on general consensus rather than evidence—affects patient outcomes such as progression-free and overall survival. The primary aim of this study is to assess MRI monitoring practice after surgery for glioblastoma, and to evaluate its association with patient outcomes. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: ImagiNg Timing aftER surgery for glioblastoma: an eVALuation of practice in Great Britain and Ireland is a retrospective multicentre study that will include 450 patients with an operated glioblastoma, treated with any adjuvant therapy regimen in the UK and Ireland. Adult patients ≥18 years diagnosed with glioblastoma and undergoing surgery between 1 August 2018 and 1 February 2019 will be included. Clinical and radiological scanning data will be collected until the date of death or date of last known follow-up. Anonymised data will be uploaded to an online Castor database. Adherence to NICE guidelines and the effect of being concordant with NICE guidelines will be identified using descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Each participating centre is required to gain local institutional approval for data collection and sharing. Formal ethical approval is not required since this is a service evaluation. Results of the study will be reported through peer-reviewed presentations and articles, and will be disseminated to participating centres, patients and the public. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9472166/ /pubmed/36100297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063043 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Oncology Gillespie, Conor S Bligh, Emily R Poon, Michael T C Solomou, Georgios Islim, Abdurrahman I Mustafa, Mohammad A Rominiyi, Ola Williams, Sophie T Kalra, Neeraj Mathew, Ryan K Booth, Thomas C Thompson, Gerard Brennan, Paul M Jenkinson, Michael D Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title | Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (INTERVAL-GB): protocol for a UK and Ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | imaging timing after glioblastoma surgery (interval-gb): protocol for a uk and ireland, multicentre retrospective cohort study |
topic | Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472166/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36100297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063043 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillespieconors imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT blighemilyr imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT poonmichaeltc imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT solomougeorgios imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT islimabdurrahmani imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mustafamohammada imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT rominiyiola imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT williamssophiet imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT kalraneeraj imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT mathewryank imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT booththomasc imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT thompsongerard imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT brennanpaulm imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT jenkinsonmichaeld imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy AT imagingtimingafterglioblastomasurgeryintervalgbprotocolforaukandirelandmulticentreretrospectivecohortstudy |