Cargando…
Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at thes...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y |
_version_ | 1784789299036684288 |
---|---|
author | Pan, Yiwen Feng, Yu Peng, Weifeng Cai, Yang Ding, Jing Wang, Xin |
author_facet | Pan, Yiwen Feng, Yu Peng, Weifeng Cai, Yang Ding, Jing Wang, Xin |
author_sort | Pan, Yiwen |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset. RESULTS: We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9472412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94724122022-09-15 Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus Pan, Yiwen Feng, Yu Peng, Weifeng Cai, Yang Ding, Jing Wang, Xin BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset. RESULTS: We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y. BioMed Central 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9472412/ /pubmed/36104657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Pan, Yiwen Feng, Yu Peng, Weifeng Cai, Yang Ding, Jing Wang, Xin Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title | Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title_full | Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title_fullStr | Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title_full_unstemmed | Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title_short | Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
title_sort | timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panyiwen timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus AT fengyu timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus AT pengweifeng timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus AT caiyang timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus AT dingjing timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus AT wangxin timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus |