Cargando…

Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus

BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at thes...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pan, Yiwen, Feng, Yu, Peng, Weifeng, Cai, Yang, Ding, Jing, Wang, Xin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y
_version_ 1784789299036684288
author Pan, Yiwen
Feng, Yu
Peng, Weifeng
Cai, Yang
Ding, Jing
Wang, Xin
author_facet Pan, Yiwen
Feng, Yu
Peng, Weifeng
Cai, Yang
Ding, Jing
Wang, Xin
author_sort Pan, Yiwen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset. RESULTS: We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9472412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94724122022-09-15 Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus Pan, Yiwen Feng, Yu Peng, Weifeng Cai, Yang Ding, Jing Wang, Xin BMC Neurol Research BACKGROUND: In 2015, the International League Against Epilepsy proposed a new conceptual definition of status epilepticus (SE) with two operational dimensions (t1 and t2) to guide emergency treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical characteristics and prognoses of patients at these two different time points. METHODS: We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adults diagnosed with SE. In case of convulsive SE, t1 is 5 min and t2 is 30 min, whereas in case of focal SE with impaired consciousness, t1 is 10 min, t2 is 60 min. Data on clinical characteristics, including age, gender, history of prior seizures, neuroimaging, semiology, duration, and etiology of SE, were collected. The primary outcome was mortality, with seizure recurrence as a secondary measure, and functional status as tertiary outcome of enrolled patients at 3 months after SE onset. RESULTS: We screened one hundred patients with SE, with a median age of 66 years and 61% were male. Fifty-six (56.0%) patients reached t1 of SE, while 44 (44.0%) reached t2 of SE. Convulsive SE (52.0%, n = 52) was more common than focal SE with impaired consciousness (48.0%, n = 48). Status epilepticus secondary to an acute symptomatic process was the most common (50%, n = 50). Patients meeting t2 of SE demonstrated a remarkably increased risk of mortality (unadjusted analysis-RR 3.606, 95%CI 1.552–8.376, p = 0.003; adjusted analysis-RR 2.924, 95%CI 1.221–7.003, p = 0.016) and unfavorable functional status (unadjusted analysis-RR 1.803, 95%CI 1.280–2.539, p = 0.001; adjusted analysis-RR 1.664, 95%CI 1.184–2.340, p = 0.003) at 3 months compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Patients reaching t2 of SE were more likely to experience seizure recurrence, however, there was no significant difference between the two cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides strong support for the new definition of SE. Patients meeting t2 of SE tend to have a remarkably increased risk of mortality and unfavorable functional outcomes compared to those who only reached t1 of SE. Furthermore, patients were likely to experience seizure recurrence after undergoing an episode of SE. Physicians must be educated about prompt recognition and appropriate management of SE. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y. BioMed Central 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9472412/ /pubmed/36104657 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Pan, Yiwen
Feng, Yu
Peng, Weifeng
Cai, Yang
Ding, Jing
Wang, Xin
Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title_full Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title_fullStr Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title_full_unstemmed Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title_short Timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
title_sort timing matters: there are significant differences in short-term outcomes between two time points of status epilepticus
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104657
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12883-022-02868-y
work_keys_str_mv AT panyiwen timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus
AT fengyu timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus
AT pengweifeng timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus
AT caiyang timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus
AT dingjing timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus
AT wangxin timingmatterstherearesignificantdifferencesinshorttermoutcomesbetweentwotimepointsofstatusepilepticus