Cargando…

How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey

BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, pref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zadro, Joshua R., Ferreira, Giovanni E., O’Keeffe, Mary, Stahl-Timmins, Will, Elkins, Mark R., Maher, Christopher G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6
_version_ 1784789303502569472
author Zadro, Joshua R.
Ferreira, Giovanni E.
O’Keeffe, Mary
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Elkins, Mark R.
Maher, Christopher G.
author_facet Zadro, Joshua R.
Ferreira, Giovanni E.
O’Keeffe, Mary
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Elkins, Mark R.
Maher, Christopher G.
author_sort Zadro, Joshua R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, preferences for information to include in infographics, and barriers to reading full-text articles. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of consumers of infographics that summarise health or medical research. Demographic and outcome data were collected and summarised using descriptive statistics. A sensitivity analysis explored whether being a researcher/academic influenced the findings. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four participants completed the survey (88% completion rate). Participants included health professionals (66%), researchers (34%), academics (24%), and patients/the public (13%). Most used Twitter (67%) and smartphones (89%) to access and view infographics, and thought infographics were useful tools to communicate research (92%) and increase the attention research receives (95%). Although most participants were somewhat/extremely likely (76%) to read the full-text article after viewing an infographic, some used infographics as a substitute for the full text at least half of the time (41%), thought infographics should be detailed enough so they do not have to read the full text (55%), and viewed infographics as tools to reduce the time burden of reading the full text (64%). Researchers/academics were less likely to report behaviours/beliefs suggesting infographics can reduce the need to read the full-text article. CONCLUSIONS: Given many people use infographics as a substitute for reading the full-text article and want infographics to be detailed enough so they don’t have to read the full text, a checklist to facilitate clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed infographics summarising some types of health and medical research may be useful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9472431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94724312022-09-15 How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey Zadro, Joshua R. Ferreira, Giovanni E. O’Keeffe, Mary Stahl-Timmins, Will Elkins, Mark R. Maher, Christopher G. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, preferences for information to include in infographics, and barriers to reading full-text articles. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of consumers of infographics that summarise health or medical research. Demographic and outcome data were collected and summarised using descriptive statistics. A sensitivity analysis explored whether being a researcher/academic influenced the findings. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four participants completed the survey (88% completion rate). Participants included health professionals (66%), researchers (34%), academics (24%), and patients/the public (13%). Most used Twitter (67%) and smartphones (89%) to access and view infographics, and thought infographics were useful tools to communicate research (92%) and increase the attention research receives (95%). Although most participants were somewhat/extremely likely (76%) to read the full-text article after viewing an infographic, some used infographics as a substitute for the full text at least half of the time (41%), thought infographics should be detailed enough so they do not have to read the full text (55%), and viewed infographics as tools to reduce the time burden of reading the full text (64%). Researchers/academics were less likely to report behaviours/beliefs suggesting infographics can reduce the need to read the full-text article. CONCLUSIONS: Given many people use infographics as a substitute for reading the full-text article and want infographics to be detailed enough so they don’t have to read the full text, a checklist to facilitate clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed infographics summarising some types of health and medical research may be useful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6. BioMed Central 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9472431/ /pubmed/36104815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Zadro, Joshua R.
Ferreira, Giovanni E.
O’Keeffe, Mary
Stahl-Timmins, Will
Elkins, Mark R.
Maher, Christopher G.
How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title_full How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title_fullStr How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title_full_unstemmed How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title_short How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
title_sort how do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? a cross-sectional survey
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472431/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104815
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6
work_keys_str_mv AT zadrojoshuar howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey
AT ferreiragiovannie howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey
AT okeeffemary howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey
AT stahltimminswill howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey
AT elkinsmarkr howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey
AT maherchristopherg howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey