Cargando…
How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey
BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, pref...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6 |
_version_ | 1784789303502569472 |
---|---|
author | Zadro, Joshua R. Ferreira, Giovanni E. O’Keeffe, Mary Stahl-Timmins, Will Elkins, Mark R. Maher, Christopher G. |
author_facet | Zadro, Joshua R. Ferreira, Giovanni E. O’Keeffe, Mary Stahl-Timmins, Will Elkins, Mark R. Maher, Christopher G. |
author_sort | Zadro, Joshua R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, preferences for information to include in infographics, and barriers to reading full-text articles. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of consumers of infographics that summarise health or medical research. Demographic and outcome data were collected and summarised using descriptive statistics. A sensitivity analysis explored whether being a researcher/academic influenced the findings. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four participants completed the survey (88% completion rate). Participants included health professionals (66%), researchers (34%), academics (24%), and patients/the public (13%). Most used Twitter (67%) and smartphones (89%) to access and view infographics, and thought infographics were useful tools to communicate research (92%) and increase the attention research receives (95%). Although most participants were somewhat/extremely likely (76%) to read the full-text article after viewing an infographic, some used infographics as a substitute for the full text at least half of the time (41%), thought infographics should be detailed enough so they do not have to read the full text (55%), and viewed infographics as tools to reduce the time burden of reading the full text (64%). Researchers/academics were less likely to report behaviours/beliefs suggesting infographics can reduce the need to read the full-text article. CONCLUSIONS: Given many people use infographics as a substitute for reading the full-text article and want infographics to be detailed enough so they don’t have to read the full text, a checklist to facilitate clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed infographics summarising some types of health and medical research may be useful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9472431 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94724312022-09-15 How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey Zadro, Joshua R. Ferreira, Giovanni E. O’Keeffe, Mary Stahl-Timmins, Will Elkins, Mark R. Maher, Christopher G. BMC Med Educ Research BACKGROUND: Understanding how people use infographics and their opinion on them has important implications for the design of infographics but has not been investigated. The aim of this study was to describe people’s use of and opinions about infographics summarising health and medical research, preferences for information to include in infographics, and barriers to reading full-text articles. METHODS: We conducted an online cross-sectional survey of consumers of infographics that summarise health or medical research. Demographic and outcome data were collected and summarised using descriptive statistics. A sensitivity analysis explored whether being a researcher/academic influenced the findings. RESULTS: Two hundred fifty-four participants completed the survey (88% completion rate). Participants included health professionals (66%), researchers (34%), academics (24%), and patients/the public (13%). Most used Twitter (67%) and smartphones (89%) to access and view infographics, and thought infographics were useful tools to communicate research (92%) and increase the attention research receives (95%). Although most participants were somewhat/extremely likely (76%) to read the full-text article after viewing an infographic, some used infographics as a substitute for the full text at least half of the time (41%), thought infographics should be detailed enough so they do not have to read the full text (55%), and viewed infographics as tools to reduce the time burden of reading the full text (64%). Researchers/academics were less likely to report behaviours/beliefs suggesting infographics can reduce the need to read the full-text article. CONCLUSIONS: Given many people use infographics as a substitute for reading the full-text article and want infographics to be detailed enough so they don’t have to read the full text, a checklist to facilitate clear, transparent, and sufficiently detailed infographics summarising some types of health and medical research may be useful. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6. BioMed Central 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9472431/ /pubmed/36104815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Zadro, Joshua R. Ferreira, Giovanni E. O’Keeffe, Mary Stahl-Timmins, Will Elkins, Mark R. Maher, Christopher G. How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title | How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title_full | How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title_fullStr | How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title_full_unstemmed | How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title_short | How do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? A cross-sectional survey |
title_sort | how do people use and view infographics that summarise health and medical research? a cross-sectional survey |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472431/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36104815 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03744-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zadrojoshuar howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey AT ferreiragiovannie howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey AT okeeffemary howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey AT stahltimminswill howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey AT elkinsmarkr howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey AT maherchristopherg howdopeopleuseandviewinfographicsthatsummarisehealthandmedicalresearchacrosssectionalsurvey |