Cargando…

Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial

Background: Simple manoeuvres such as head elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP) can facilitate a better glottic view. We conducted this prospective randomised clinical trial to compare the glottic view in a HELP with the same patient in supine and 25° backup positions. Methods: A total of 180 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nandhakumar, Janani, Vadlamudi Reddy, Hemanth Kumar, Maurya, Indubala, Nag, Kusha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AVES 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110024
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2021.1058
_version_ 1784789349319049216
author Nandhakumar, Janani
Vadlamudi Reddy, Hemanth Kumar
Maurya, Indubala
Nag, Kusha
author_facet Nandhakumar, Janani
Vadlamudi Reddy, Hemanth Kumar
Maurya, Indubala
Nag, Kusha
author_sort Nandhakumar, Janani
collection PubMed
description Background: Simple manoeuvres such as head elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP) can facilitate a better glottic view. We conducted this prospective randomised clinical trial to compare the glottic view in a HELP with the same patient in supine and 25° backup positions. Methods: A total of 180 patients aged between 18 and 65 years who planned for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope were included. Any patient with anticipated airway difficulty, emergency surgeries, or rapid sequence induction was excluded. All patients were randomised into two groups (group B = 90 and group S = 90). In group S, the glottic view was assessed whilst the patients were in the 25° backup HELP position (first position). Then, the patients were repositioned and intubated in the supine HELP (second position) position after reassessing the glottic view. In group B, the glottic view was assessed whilst the patients were in the supine HELP position (first position). Then, the patients were repositioned and intubated in the 25° backup HELP position (second position) after reassessing the glottic view. Percentage of glottis opening score (POGO), Cormack Lehane (CL) grade, laryngoscopy time, intubation time, attempts for intubation, anaesthesiologists comfort, use of ancillary devices/manoeuvres, and ease of intubation were recorded. Results: The mean POGO score was significantly more in 25° backup than supine position (n = 180; 25° backup HELP: 64.78±26.83% vs supine HELP: 46.96±27.71%, P-value <.0001). The CL grade was significantly higher in the supine HELP position than the 25° backup HELP position (n = 180, P-value < .0001). The mean laryngoscopy time was comparable between two positions (n = 180, supine with HELP: 9.38±3.80 seconds, 25° backup with HELP: 9.47±3.80 seconds; P-value: .608). The mean intubation time was significantly shorter (P = .001) in group B (7.7±2.2 seconds) than group S (9.2±3.6 seconds). Conclusions: This study has shown that the 25° backup HELP position provides improved glottic view in comparison with the supine HELP position.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9472689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher AVES
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94726892022-09-26 Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial Nandhakumar, Janani Vadlamudi Reddy, Hemanth Kumar Maurya, Indubala Nag, Kusha Turk J Anaesthesiol Reanim Original Articles Background: Simple manoeuvres such as head elevated laryngoscopy position (HELP) can facilitate a better glottic view. We conducted this prospective randomised clinical trial to compare the glottic view in a HELP with the same patient in supine and 25° backup positions. Methods: A total of 180 patients aged between 18 and 65 years who planned for elective surgery under general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation using Macintosh laryngoscope were included. Any patient with anticipated airway difficulty, emergency surgeries, or rapid sequence induction was excluded. All patients were randomised into two groups (group B = 90 and group S = 90). In group S, the glottic view was assessed whilst the patients were in the 25° backup HELP position (first position). Then, the patients were repositioned and intubated in the supine HELP (second position) position after reassessing the glottic view. In group B, the glottic view was assessed whilst the patients were in the supine HELP position (first position). Then, the patients were repositioned and intubated in the 25° backup HELP position (second position) after reassessing the glottic view. Percentage of glottis opening score (POGO), Cormack Lehane (CL) grade, laryngoscopy time, intubation time, attempts for intubation, anaesthesiologists comfort, use of ancillary devices/manoeuvres, and ease of intubation were recorded. Results: The mean POGO score was significantly more in 25° backup than supine position (n = 180; 25° backup HELP: 64.78±26.83% vs supine HELP: 46.96±27.71%, P-value <.0001). The CL grade was significantly higher in the supine HELP position than the 25° backup HELP position (n = 180, P-value < .0001). The mean laryngoscopy time was comparable between two positions (n = 180, supine with HELP: 9.38±3.80 seconds, 25° backup with HELP: 9.47±3.80 seconds; P-value: .608). The mean intubation time was significantly shorter (P = .001) in group B (7.7±2.2 seconds) than group S (9.2±3.6 seconds). Conclusions: This study has shown that the 25° backup HELP position provides improved glottic view in comparison with the supine HELP position. AVES 2021-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC9472689/ /pubmed/35110024 http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2021.1058 Text en © Copyright 2021 by Turkish Society of Anaesthesiology and Reanimation - Available online at www.turkjanaesthesiolreanim.org https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)
spellingShingle Original Articles
Nandhakumar, Janani
Vadlamudi Reddy, Hemanth Kumar
Maurya, Indubala
Nag, Kusha
Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title_full Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title_short Comparison of the Glottic Views in a Head Elevated Laryngoscopy Position with the Patient in Supine or 25° Backup: An Observer-Blinded Randomised Clinical Trial
title_sort comparison of the glottic views in a head elevated laryngoscopy position with the patient in supine or 25° backup: an observer-blinded randomised clinical trial
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9472689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35110024
http://dx.doi.org/10.5152/TJAR.2021.1058
work_keys_str_mv AT nandhakumarjanani comparisonoftheglotticviewsinaheadelevatedlaryngoscopypositionwiththepatientinsupineor25backupanobserverblindedrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT vadlamudireddyhemanthkumar comparisonoftheglotticviewsinaheadelevatedlaryngoscopypositionwiththepatientinsupineor25backupanobserverblindedrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT mauryaindubala comparisonoftheglotticviewsinaheadelevatedlaryngoscopypositionwiththepatientinsupineor25backupanobserverblindedrandomisedclinicaltrial
AT nagkusha comparisonoftheglotticviewsinaheadelevatedlaryngoscopypositionwiththepatientinsupineor25backupanobserverblindedrandomisedclinicaltrial