Cargando…

The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice

BACKGROUND: The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) is a short questionnaire to screen for visual complaints in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to investigate the factor structure of the SVCq to increase the usability of this measure in clinical p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Lijn, Iris, de Haan, Gera A., van der Feen, Fleur E., Huizinga, Famke, Fuermaier, Anselm B. M., van Laar, Teus, Heutink, Joost
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272559
_version_ 1784789499079819264
author van der Lijn, Iris
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Feen, Fleur E.
Huizinga, Famke
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
van Laar, Teus
Heutink, Joost
author_facet van der Lijn, Iris
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Feen, Fleur E.
Huizinga, Famke
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
van Laar, Teus
Heutink, Joost
author_sort van der Lijn, Iris
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) is a short questionnaire to screen for visual complaints in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to investigate the factor structure of the SVCq to increase the usability of this measure in clinical practice and facilitate the interpretation of visual complaints in people with PD. METHODS: We performed a confirmatory factor analysis using the 19 items of the SVCq of 581 people with PD, investigating the fit of three models previously found in a community sample: a one-factor model including all items, and models where items are distributed across either three or five factors. The clinical value of derived subscales was explored by comparing scores with age-matched controls (N = 583), and by investigating relationships to demographic and disease related characteristics. RESULTS: All three models showed a good fit in people with PD, with the five-factor model outperforming the three-factor and one-factor model. Five factors were distinguished: ‘Diminished visual perception–Function related’ (5 items), ‘Diminished visual perception–Luminance related’ (3 items), ‘Diminished visual perception–Task related’ (3 items), ‘Altered visual perception’ (6 items), and ‘Ocular discomfort’ (2 items). On each subscale, people with PD reported more complaints than controls, even when there was no ophthalmological condition present. Furthermore, subscales were sensitive to relevant clinical characteristics, like age, disease duration, severity, and medication use. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor model showed a good fit in people with PD and has clinical relevance. Each subscale provides a solid basis for individualized visual care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9473425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94734252022-09-15 The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice van der Lijn, Iris de Haan, Gera A. van der Feen, Fleur E. Huizinga, Famke Fuermaier, Anselm B. M. van Laar, Teus Heutink, Joost PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) is a short questionnaire to screen for visual complaints in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD). OBJECTIVE: The current study aims to investigate the factor structure of the SVCq to increase the usability of this measure in clinical practice and facilitate the interpretation of visual complaints in people with PD. METHODS: We performed a confirmatory factor analysis using the 19 items of the SVCq of 581 people with PD, investigating the fit of three models previously found in a community sample: a one-factor model including all items, and models where items are distributed across either three or five factors. The clinical value of derived subscales was explored by comparing scores with age-matched controls (N = 583), and by investigating relationships to demographic and disease related characteristics. RESULTS: All three models showed a good fit in people with PD, with the five-factor model outperforming the three-factor and one-factor model. Five factors were distinguished: ‘Diminished visual perception–Function related’ (5 items), ‘Diminished visual perception–Luminance related’ (3 items), ‘Diminished visual perception–Task related’ (3 items), ‘Altered visual perception’ (6 items), and ‘Ocular discomfort’ (2 items). On each subscale, people with PD reported more complaints than controls, even when there was no ophthalmological condition present. Furthermore, subscales were sensitive to relevant clinical characteristics, like age, disease duration, severity, and medication use. CONCLUSIONS: The five-factor model showed a good fit in people with PD and has clinical relevance. Each subscale provides a solid basis for individualized visual care. Public Library of Science 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9473425/ /pubmed/36103511 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272559 Text en © 2022 van der Lijn et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Lijn, Iris
de Haan, Gera A.
van der Feen, Fleur E.
Huizinga, Famke
Fuermaier, Anselm B. M.
van Laar, Teus
Heutink, Joost
The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title_full The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title_fullStr The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title_full_unstemmed The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title_short The Screening Visual Complaints questionnaire (SVCq) in people with Parkinson’s disease—Confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
title_sort screening visual complaints questionnaire (svcq) in people with parkinson’s disease—confirmatory factor analysis and advice for its use in clinical practice
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473425/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36103511
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272559
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderlijniris thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT dehaangeraa thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT vanderfeenfleure thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT huizingafamke thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT fuermaieranselmbm thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT vanlaarteus thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT heutinkjoost thescreeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT vanderlijniris screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT dehaangeraa screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT vanderfeenfleure screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT huizingafamke screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT fuermaieranselmbm screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT vanlaarteus screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice
AT heutinkjoost screeningvisualcomplaintsquestionnairesvcqinpeoplewithparkinsonsdiseaseconfirmatoryfactoranalysisandadviceforitsuseinclinicalpractice