Cargando…
Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest
Spaceflight is associated with enhanced inactivity, resulting in muscular and cardiovascular deconditioning. Although physical exercise is commonly used as a countermeasure, separate applications of running and resistive exercise modalities have never been directly compared during long-term bedrest....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.902983 |
_version_ | 1784789549270958080 |
---|---|
author | Robin, Adrien Wang, Linjie Custaud, Marc-Antoine Liu, Jiexin Yuan, Min Li, Zhili Lloret, Jean-Christophe Liu, Shujuan Dai, Xiaoqian Zhang, Jianfeng Lv, Ke Li, Wenjiong Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette Wang, Huijuan Li, Kai Li, Xiaotao Qu, Lina Navasiolava, Nastassia Li, Yinghui |
author_facet | Robin, Adrien Wang, Linjie Custaud, Marc-Antoine Liu, Jiexin Yuan, Min Li, Zhili Lloret, Jean-Christophe Liu, Shujuan Dai, Xiaoqian Zhang, Jianfeng Lv, Ke Li, Wenjiong Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette Wang, Huijuan Li, Kai Li, Xiaotao Qu, Lina Navasiolava, Nastassia Li, Yinghui |
author_sort | Robin, Adrien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Spaceflight is associated with enhanced inactivity, resulting in muscular and cardiovascular deconditioning. Although physical exercise is commonly used as a countermeasure, separate applications of running and resistive exercise modalities have never been directly compared during long-term bedrest. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two exercise countermeasure programs, running and resistance training, applied separately, for counteracting cardiovascular deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest (HDBR). Maximal oxygen uptake ( [Formula: see text] O(2)max), orthostatic tolerance, continuous ECG and blood pressure (BP), body composition, and leg circumferences were measured in the control group (CON: n = 8), running exercise group (RUN: n = 7), and resistive exercise group (RES: n = 7). After HDBR, the decrease in [Formula: see text] O(2)max was prevented by RUN countermeasure and limited by RES countermeasure (−26% in CON p < 0.05, −15% in RES p < 0.05, and −4% in RUN ns). Subjects demonstrated surprisingly modest orthostatic tolerance decrease for different groups, including controls. Lean mass loss was limited by RES and RUN protocols (−10% in CON vs. −5% to 6% in RES and RUN). Both countermeasures prevented the loss in thigh circumference (−7% in CON p < 0.05, −2% in RES ns, and −0.6% in RUN ns) and limited loss in calf circumference (−10% in CON vs. −7% in RES vs. −5% in RUN). Day–night variations in systolic BP were preserved during HDBR. Decrease in [Formula: see text] O(2)max positively correlated with decrease in thigh (r = 0.54 and p = 0.009) and calf (r = 0.52 and p = 0.012) circumferences. During this 90-day strict HDBR, running exercise successfully preserved [Formula: see text] O(2)max, and resistance exercise limited its decline. Both countermeasures limited loss in global lean mass and leg circumferences. The [Formula: see text] O(2)max reduction seems to be conditioned more by muscular than by cardiovascular parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9473647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-94736472022-09-15 Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest Robin, Adrien Wang, Linjie Custaud, Marc-Antoine Liu, Jiexin Yuan, Min Li, Zhili Lloret, Jean-Christophe Liu, Shujuan Dai, Xiaoqian Zhang, Jianfeng Lv, Ke Li, Wenjiong Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette Wang, Huijuan Li, Kai Li, Xiaotao Qu, Lina Navasiolava, Nastassia Li, Yinghui Front Physiol Physiology Spaceflight is associated with enhanced inactivity, resulting in muscular and cardiovascular deconditioning. Although physical exercise is commonly used as a countermeasure, separate applications of running and resistive exercise modalities have never been directly compared during long-term bedrest. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of two exercise countermeasure programs, running and resistance training, applied separately, for counteracting cardiovascular deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest (HDBR). Maximal oxygen uptake ( [Formula: see text] O(2)max), orthostatic tolerance, continuous ECG and blood pressure (BP), body composition, and leg circumferences were measured in the control group (CON: n = 8), running exercise group (RUN: n = 7), and resistive exercise group (RES: n = 7). After HDBR, the decrease in [Formula: see text] O(2)max was prevented by RUN countermeasure and limited by RES countermeasure (−26% in CON p < 0.05, −15% in RES p < 0.05, and −4% in RUN ns). Subjects demonstrated surprisingly modest orthostatic tolerance decrease for different groups, including controls. Lean mass loss was limited by RES and RUN protocols (−10% in CON vs. −5% to 6% in RES and RUN). Both countermeasures prevented the loss in thigh circumference (−7% in CON p < 0.05, −2% in RES ns, and −0.6% in RUN ns) and limited loss in calf circumference (−10% in CON vs. −7% in RES vs. −5% in RUN). Day–night variations in systolic BP were preserved during HDBR. Decrease in [Formula: see text] O(2)max positively correlated with decrease in thigh (r = 0.54 and p = 0.009) and calf (r = 0.52 and p = 0.012) circumferences. During this 90-day strict HDBR, running exercise successfully preserved [Formula: see text] O(2)max, and resistance exercise limited its decline. Both countermeasures limited loss in global lean mass and leg circumferences. The [Formula: see text] O(2)max reduction seems to be conditioned more by muscular than by cardiovascular parameters. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9473647/ /pubmed/36117704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.902983 Text en Copyright © 2022 Robin, Wang, Custaud, Liu, Yuan, Li, Lloret, Liu, Dai, Zhang, Lv, Li, Gauquelin-Koch, Wang, Li, Li, Qu, Navasiolava and Li. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Physiology Robin, Adrien Wang, Linjie Custaud, Marc-Antoine Liu, Jiexin Yuan, Min Li, Zhili Lloret, Jean-Christophe Liu, Shujuan Dai, Xiaoqian Zhang, Jianfeng Lv, Ke Li, Wenjiong Gauquelin-Koch, Guillemette Wang, Huijuan Li, Kai Li, Xiaotao Qu, Lina Navasiolava, Nastassia Li, Yinghui Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title | Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title_full | Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title_fullStr | Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title_full_unstemmed | Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title_short | Running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
title_sort | running vs. resistance exercise to counteract deconditioning induced by 90-day head-down bedrest |
topic | Physiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36117704 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.902983 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robinadrien runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT wanglinjie runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT custaudmarcantoine runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT liujiexin runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT yuanmin runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT lizhili runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT lloretjeanchristophe runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT liushujuan runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT daixiaoqian runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT zhangjianfeng runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT lvke runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT liwenjiong runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT gauquelinkochguillemette runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT wanghuijuan runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT likai runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT lixiaotao runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT qulina runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT navasiolavanastassia runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest AT liyinghui runningvsresistanceexercisetocounteractdeconditioninginducedby90dayheaddownbedrest |