Cargando…

Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model

Current treatment for volumetric muscle loss is limited to muscle transfer or acellular collagen scaffold (ACS) therapies that are associated with donor site morbidity and nonfunctional fibrosis, respectively. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of amniotic membrane scaffold (AMS) for vol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Awad, Mohamed, Kurlander, David E., Kotha, Vikas S., Malone, Kevin, Davidson, Edward H., Kumar, Anand R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004499
_version_ 1784789572782129152
author Awad, Mohamed
Kurlander, David E.
Kotha, Vikas S.
Malone, Kevin
Davidson, Edward H.
Kumar, Anand R.
author_facet Awad, Mohamed
Kurlander, David E.
Kotha, Vikas S.
Malone, Kevin
Davidson, Edward H.
Kumar, Anand R.
author_sort Awad, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description Current treatment for volumetric muscle loss is limited to muscle transfer or acellular collagen scaffold (ACS) therapies that are associated with donor site morbidity and nonfunctional fibrosis, respectively. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of amniotic membrane scaffold (AMS) for volumetric muscle loss treatment. METHODS: Murine quadriceps defects were created and randomized to three groups (n = 5/group): untreated controls, ACS, and AMS. In vivo muscle regeneration volume was quantified by MRI and microcomputed tomography. Muscle explants were analyzed using standard histology and whole-mount immunofluorescence at 8 weeks. RESULTS: The cross-sectional muscle regeneration ratio was 0.64 ± 0.3 for AMS, 0.48 ± 0.07 for ACS, and 0.4 0 ± 0.03 for controls as assessed by MRI (P = 0.09) and 0.61 ± 0.28 for AMS, 0.50 ± 0.06 for ACS, and 0.43 ± 0.04 for controls as assessed by microcomputed tomography (P = 0.2). Histologically, AMS demonstrated significantly higher cellular density (900 ± 2 70 nuclei/high powered field) than ACS (210 ± 36) and control (130 ± 4) groups (P = 0.05). Immunofluorescence for laminin (AMS 623 ± 11 versus ACS 339 ± 3 versus control 115 ± 7; P < 0.01) and myosin heavy chain (AMS 509 ± 7 versus ACS 288 ± 5 versus control 84 ± 5; P = 0.03) indicated greater organized muscle fiber formation with AMS. CONCLUSION: AMS mediated muscle healing was characterized by increased cellular infiltration and organized muscle formation when compared with controls and ACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9473793
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-94737932022-09-16 Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model Awad, Mohamed Kurlander, David E. Kotha, Vikas S. Malone, Kevin Davidson, Edward H. Kumar, Anand R. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Research Current treatment for volumetric muscle loss is limited to muscle transfer or acellular collagen scaffold (ACS) therapies that are associated with donor site morbidity and nonfunctional fibrosis, respectively. The aim of this study is to assess the utility of amniotic membrane scaffold (AMS) for volumetric muscle loss treatment. METHODS: Murine quadriceps defects were created and randomized to three groups (n = 5/group): untreated controls, ACS, and AMS. In vivo muscle regeneration volume was quantified by MRI and microcomputed tomography. Muscle explants were analyzed using standard histology and whole-mount immunofluorescence at 8 weeks. RESULTS: The cross-sectional muscle regeneration ratio was 0.64 ± 0.3 for AMS, 0.48 ± 0.07 for ACS, and 0.4 0 ± 0.03 for controls as assessed by MRI (P = 0.09) and 0.61 ± 0.28 for AMS, 0.50 ± 0.06 for ACS, and 0.43 ± 0.04 for controls as assessed by microcomputed tomography (P = 0.2). Histologically, AMS demonstrated significantly higher cellular density (900 ± 2 70 nuclei/high powered field) than ACS (210 ± 36) and control (130 ± 4) groups (P = 0.05). Immunofluorescence for laminin (AMS 623 ± 11 versus ACS 339 ± 3 versus control 115 ± 7; P < 0.01) and myosin heavy chain (AMS 509 ± 7 versus ACS 288 ± 5 versus control 84 ± 5; P = 0.03) indicated greater organized muscle fiber formation with AMS. CONCLUSION: AMS mediated muscle healing was characterized by increased cellular infiltration and organized muscle formation when compared with controls and ACS. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2022-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9473793/ /pubmed/36119379 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004499 Text en Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Research
Awad, Mohamed
Kurlander, David E.
Kotha, Vikas S.
Malone, Kevin
Davidson, Edward H.
Kumar, Anand R.
Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title_full Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title_fullStr Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title_full_unstemmed Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title_short Amniotic Membrane Scaffolds Support Organized Muscle Regeneration in A Murine Volumetric Muscle Defect Model
title_sort amniotic membrane scaffolds support organized muscle regeneration in a murine volumetric muscle defect model
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9473793/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36119379
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000004499
work_keys_str_mv AT awadmohamed amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel
AT kurlanderdavide amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel
AT kothavikass amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel
AT malonekevin amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel
AT davidsonedwardh amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel
AT kumaranandr amnioticmembranescaffoldssupportorganizedmuscleregenerationinamurinevolumetricmuscledefectmodel